History
  • No items yet
midpage
111 Fed. Cl. 1
Fed. Cl.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • This patent case is in the United States Court of Federal Claims, No. 11-268C, SecurityPoint Holdings, Inc. v. United States, filed February 20, 2013, under 28 U.S.C. §1498.
  • SecurityPoint alleges TSA’s use of its tray-and-cart system at airport security checkpoints infringes claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,888,460 (the 460 patent).
  • The 460 patent concerns recycling trays through security screening checkpoints using movable tray carts and advertising on the trays’ interiors or bottoms.
  • Claims 1-4, 6-9, and 12-15 are asserted; Claim 1 describes a method involving a first tray cart at the proximate end of a scanning device, removing a tray, passing it through the scanner, receiving it in a second cart at the distal end, and moving the second cart to the proximate end.
  • The parties filed claim-construction briefs on seven terms; plaintiff argues plain meaning suffices, with preferred constructions if needed.
  • Markman hearing occurred November 14, 2012; the court provides constructions for the terms and notes related schedule amendments.]
  • The court adopts specific constructions for key terms (tray, trays, tray cart, proximate end, distal end, nestable, adapted, receiving).
  • The court also modifies discovery deadlines (expert reports due by March 8, 2013; rebuttals by April 10, 2013) and schedules a status conference.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Meaning of ‘tray’ Trays are base structures with upward walls; plural implies multiple trays. Tray may encompass sizes; defend’s view is broader. Tray = base with upwardly extending walls; ‘trays’ = more than one tray; no size limitation.
Meaning of ‘tray cart’ Tray cart may be a movable cart or rack; expert testimony supports movable cart. Tray cart could be a cart or rack; should cover holding or storing trays. Tray cart = movable cart capable of holding one or more trays; not a rack; does not require storing function.
Meaning of ‘proximate end’ and ‘distal end’ Proximate and distal ends refer to ends of the scanning device relevant to entry/exit points. Definitions should be precise endpoints reflecting the device ends. Proximate end = end of the scanner where an object enters; distal end = end where it exits.
Meaning of ‘nestable’ Nestable means capable of fitting compactly within one another; allows multiple sizes. Nestable means capable of fitting at least partially within one another. Nestable = capable of fitting compactly within one another.
Meaning of ‘adapted’ Adapted = suited; not limited to specially designed. Adapted = specially designed or made for a specific purpose. Adapted = suited; avoids reading in unnecessary limitations of special design.

Key Cases Cited

  • Phillips v. AWH Corp., 415 F.3d 1303 (Fed. Cir. 2005) (claim terms construed in light of ordinary meaning and intrinsic evidence)
  • Interactive Gift Express, Inc. v. Compuserve, Inc., 256 F.3d 1323 (Fed. Cir. 2001) (extrinsic evidence used cautiously and not to contradict claim scope)
  • U.S. Surgical Corp. v. Ethicon, Inc., 103 F.3d 1554 (Fed. Cir. 1997) (plain meaning if unambiguous; read in full patent context)
  • Harris Corp. v. United States, 114 F.3d 1152 (Fed. Cir. 1997) (avoid adding meaningless verbiage; avoid surplusage in claim construction)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Securitypoint Holdings, Inc. v. United States
Court Name: United States Court of Federal Claims
Date Published: Feb 20, 2013
Citations: 111 Fed. Cl. 1; 2013 U.S. Claims LEXIS 95; 2013 WL 659543; 11-268C
Docket Number: 11-268C
Court Abbreviation: Fed. Cl.
Log In
    Securitypoint Holdings, Inc. v. United States, 111 Fed. Cl. 1