History
  • No items yet
midpage
302 P.3d 460
Or. Ct. App.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Plaintiff was severely intoxicated after being served by defendant at its bar and drove home the wrong way on an interstate, causing a serious collision.
  • Plaintiff sustained severe injuries (quadriplegia) and had a BAC of 0.24% upon hospital admission.
  • Plaintiff filed a negligence action alleging over-service, failure to prevent driving, and failure to arrange alternative transportation.
  • Trial court granted dismissal under ORS 471.565(1), which immunizes servers from first-party intoxication claims when the patron voluntarily consumes alcohol.
  • On appeal, plaintiff contends (i) she did not voluntarily consume the alcohol that caused the injury, (ii) the second sentence of ORS 471.565(1) allows non-service-based negligence claims, and (iii) the statute violates remedy and jury-trial guarantees.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether ORS 471.565(1) bars first-party intoxication claims Plaintiff argues she was involuntarily intoxicated after initial drinking Defendant argues voluntary consumption includes intoxication that follows initial drinking Yes; voluntary consumption includes the intoxication here and the first-party claim is barred.
Whether abandonment and transportation-failure claims survive under the second sentence Plaintiff contends these arise from acts other than serving alcohol Defendant contends immunity extends to service-related conduct only and does not shield non-service acts No; second sentence does not carve out these claims when they hinge on service-imposed intoxication.
Whether remedy and jury-trial provisions are violated by the statute Remedy and jury-trial rights are violated by immunizing the server Statutory scheme provides an adequate remedy and maintains jury trial where applicable Not violated; remedy and jury-trial guarantees preserved given historical context and lack of 1857 common-law claim.

Key Cases Cited

  • Fulmer v. Timber Inn Restaurant & Lounge, Inc., 330 Or 413 (2000) (recognized intoxicated party claim against server prior to 471.565(1))
  • Ibach v. Jackson, 148 Or 92 (1934) (first-party common-law intoxication claim against alcohol provider)
  • Smothers v. Gresham Transfer, Inc., 332 Or 83 (2001) (remedy clause analysis for 1857 rights)
  • Howell v. Boyle, 353 Or 359 (2013) (contributory negligence history and remedy-clause dicta)
  • Clarke v. OHSU, 343 Or 581 (2007) (remedy clause analysis of sovereign/immunity context)
  • Cunningham v. Happy Palace, Inc., 157 Or App 334 (1998) (pre-471.565(1) authorities on related negligence)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Schutz v. La Costita III, Inc.
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Oregon
Date Published: May 15, 2013
Citations: 302 P.3d 460; 2013 WL 2101488; 256 Or. App. 573; 2013 Ore. App. LEXIS 546; 101217338; A148768
Docket Number: 101217338; A148768
Court Abbreviation: Or. Ct. App.
Log In