02-23-00351-CV
Tex. App.May 9, 2024Background
- Rogelio Regalado, an inmate in TDCJ custody, sued Management & Training Corporation (MTC) and Warden L. Thomas for failing to provide Kosher meals at the Bridgeport correctional facility.
- He asserted violations of his religious rights under the Texas Constitution, seeking damages and injunctive and declaratory relief.
- Regalado followed the prison grievance procedure before filing suit, but was transferred to a different unit prior to filing.
- The trial court dismissed his case under Chapter 14 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code, which governs inmate litigation.
- Regalado appealed, arguing compliance with procedures and asserting claims under federal law and that MTC could not claim sovereign immunity as a private contractor.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sovereign Immunity | MTC, as a private corporation, is not immune from suit. | MTC is entitled to sovereign immunity as a state contractor. | MTC cannot claim sovereign immunity for these alleged acts. |
| Damages for Texas Constitution Violation | Entitled to damages for violation of religious rights. | No private right of action for damages exists under TX Constitution. | No damages available for alleged constitutional violation. |
| Injunctive/Declaratory Relief | Entitled to relief compelling provision of Kosher meals. | Claims are moot since plaintiff is no longer at MTC facility. | Claims for injunctive/declaratory relief are moot. |
| Negligence Claims | Defendant failed to provide a nutritious, religiously appropriate diet. | Claims inadequately pled; no legal/factual basis shown. | Negligence claims waived for inadequate briefing. |
Key Cases Cited
- City of Beaumont v. Bouillion, 896 S.W.2d 143 (Tex. 1995) (no private damages action for violation of the Texas Constitution)
- Republican Party of Tex. v. Dietz, 940 S.W.2d 86 (Tex. 1997) (Bill of Rights generally applies to government actions)
- Rusk State Hosp. v. Black, 392 S.W.3d 88 (Tex. 2012) (immunity as a jurisdictional question)
- University of the Incarnate Word v. Redus, 602 S.W.3d 398 (Tex. 2020) (private contractor immunity depends on government control)
- City of Arlington v. Randall, 301 S.W.3d 896 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2009) (no damages for constitutional violations)
