Robinson v. State
299 Ga. 648
| Ga. | 2016Background
- On December 1, 2007, Bernard Robinson and others chased and assaulted John Stephen Mitchell in a known drug area; Mitchell was pistol‑whipped, stabbed by Ralph Woods, and shot in the back by Robinson, causing Mitchell’s death.
- Robinson retrieved a gun from a third party’s home before the attack; afterwards he admitted to shooting Mitchell and said he "had to teach him a lesson."
- Robinson and Woods were tried jointly; Robinson was convicted of malice murder and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon and sentenced to life plus five years.
- Robinson moved for an out‑of‑time appeal; the trial court granted it and Robinson appealed his convictions to the Supreme Court of Georgia.
- On appeal Robinson raised three main claims: (1) insufficiency of the evidence, (2) ineffective assistance of trial counsel based on delayed appointment, and (3) trial court error in failing to remove a juror who reported her husband’s grand‑jury service on the indictment.
Issues
| Issue | Robinson's Argument | State's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sufficiency of the evidence for malice murder and firearm possession | Evidence insufficient; killing was provoked and not deliberate | Evidence showed planning, return for a gun, violent group assault, admission and statement showing intent; supports malice murder and firearm possession | Affirmed: evidence sufficient; interval allowed reason/revenge finding (malice) |
| Ineffective assistance of counsel (delay in appointment) | Delay in appointment prejudiced defense by preventing counsel from locating transient witnesses | Delay speculative; no testimony from uncalled witnesses or proffer showing prejudice | Denied: no prejudice shown under Strickland; claim fails on prejudice prong |
| Juror removal for cause (Juror Schlich) | Juror should have been removed after seeing her husband listed on the indictment as a grand juror | Juror stated she could be impartial; trial court questioned her and counsel accepted the response | Not preserved (acquiescence) and, on the merits, no abuse of discretion; trial court acted within authority |
| Preservation of appellate objections | Trial counsel voiced satisfaction with court’s curative procedure | State notes counsel’s assent waived appellate review | Held waived: Robinson acquiesced and cannot complain on appeal |
Key Cases Cited
- Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (evidence reviewed in light most favorable to the verdict standard)
- Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (standard for ineffective assistance: deficient performance and prejudice)
- Barge v. State, 294 Ga. 567 (failure to proffer uncalled witness defeats Strickland prejudice showing)
- Wright v. State, 291 Ga. 869 (reviewing court accepts trial court’s factual findings but applies law independently)
- Fuller v. State, 277 Ga. 505 (Strickland prong analysis guidance)
- Robinson v. State, 277 Ga. 75 (precedent on accepting trial court findings and credibility determinations)
- Gardiner v. State, 264 Ga. 329 (acquiescence in curative procedure waives juror‑related appellate claims)
- Malcolm v. State, 263 Ga. 369 (procedural note regarding merger and vacatur of certain convictions)
