History
  • No items yet
midpage
Robinson v. State
299 Ga. 648
| Ga. | 2016
Read the full case

Background

  • On December 1, 2007, Bernard Robinson and others chased and assaulted John Stephen Mitchell in a known drug area; Mitchell was pistol‑whipped, stabbed by Ralph Woods, and shot in the back by Robinson, causing Mitchell’s death.
  • Robinson retrieved a gun from a third party’s home before the attack; afterwards he admitted to shooting Mitchell and said he "had to teach him a lesson."
  • Robinson and Woods were tried jointly; Robinson was convicted of malice murder and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon and sentenced to life plus five years.
  • Robinson moved for an out‑of‑time appeal; the trial court granted it and Robinson appealed his convictions to the Supreme Court of Georgia.
  • On appeal Robinson raised three main claims: (1) insufficiency of the evidence, (2) ineffective assistance of trial counsel based on delayed appointment, and (3) trial court error in failing to remove a juror who reported her husband’s grand‑jury service on the indictment.

Issues

Issue Robinson's Argument State's Argument Held
Sufficiency of the evidence for malice murder and firearm possession Evidence insufficient; killing was provoked and not deliberate Evidence showed planning, return for a gun, violent group assault, admission and statement showing intent; supports malice murder and firearm possession Affirmed: evidence sufficient; interval allowed reason/revenge finding (malice)
Ineffective assistance of counsel (delay in appointment) Delay in appointment prejudiced defense by preventing counsel from locating transient witnesses Delay speculative; no testimony from uncalled witnesses or proffer showing prejudice Denied: no prejudice shown under Strickland; claim fails on prejudice prong
Juror removal for cause (Juror Schlich) Juror should have been removed after seeing her husband listed on the indictment as a grand juror Juror stated she could be impartial; trial court questioned her and counsel accepted the response Not preserved (acquiescence) and, on the merits, no abuse of discretion; trial court acted within authority
Preservation of appellate objections Trial counsel voiced satisfaction with court’s curative procedure State notes counsel’s assent waived appellate review Held waived: Robinson acquiesced and cannot complain on appeal

Key Cases Cited

  • Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (evidence reviewed in light most favorable to the verdict standard)
  • Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (standard for ineffective assistance: deficient performance and prejudice)
  • Barge v. State, 294 Ga. 567 (failure to proffer uncalled witness defeats Strickland prejudice showing)
  • Wright v. State, 291 Ga. 869 (reviewing court accepts trial court’s factual findings but applies law independently)
  • Fuller v. State, 277 Ga. 505 (Strickland prong analysis guidance)
  • Robinson v. State, 277 Ga. 75 (precedent on accepting trial court findings and credibility determinations)
  • Gardiner v. State, 264 Ga. 329 (acquiescence in curative procedure waives juror‑related appellate claims)
  • Malcolm v. State, 263 Ga. 369 (procedural note regarding merger and vacatur of certain convictions)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Robinson v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Sep 12, 2016
Citation: 299 Ga. 648
Docket Number: S16A1274
Court Abbreviation: Ga.