History
  • No items yet
midpage
143 T.C. 393
Tax Ct.
2014
Read the full case

Background

  • Petitioner filed a whistleblower claim under I.R.C. § 7623(b)(4) after IRS collected $844,746 from the target.
  • IRS letter approved an award under § 7623(a) of about $126,712; no § 7623(b) award was initially approved.
  • § 7623(b)(5)(B) requires that the amount in dispute exceed $2,000,000 for § 7623(b) applicability.
  • Respondent moved to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction arguing petitioner did not meet the $2 million threshold.
  • Court denied the motion, finding the $2 million requirement is not jurisdictional and is an affirmative defense.
  • Court allowed respondent 60 days to seek leave to amend the answer to raise § 7623(b)(5)(B).

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Is the $2 million requirement jurisdictional? Lippolis argues the threshold is jurisdictional based on text and history. Commissioner contends it is a nonjurisdictional limit, an affirmative defense. Not jurisdictional; treated as an affirmative defense.
Who bears the burden to prove the $2 million defense? Burden not clearly allocated; need more information. Duties and records may be confidential; whistleblower bears burden. Commissioner bears the burden of proof on the defense.
Should the court dismiss for lack of jurisdiction pending amendment? Await further evidence on amount in dispute. Amend to raise the defense should be allowed. Motion to dismiss denied; leave to amend granted.

Key Cases Cited

  • Breman v. Commissioner, 66 T.C. 61 (1976) (Tax Court jurisdiction limits clarified)
  • Ray v. Kertes, 285 F.3d 287 (3d Cir. 2002) (burden allocation for affirmative defenses)
  • ITSI T.V. Prods., Inc. v. Agricultural Ass’ns, 3 F.3d 1292 (9th Cir. 1993) (peculiarly within the knowledge of one party; burden of proof on that party)
  • Covey Co., 316 F.3d 337 (2d Cir. 2003) (affirmative defenses; practicality and fairness)
  • Arbaugh v. Y&H Corp., 546 U.S. 500 (2006) (bright-line jurisdictional analysis; proximity alone not determinative)
  • Reed Elsevier, Inc. v. Muchnick, 559 U.S. 154 (2010) (textual and historical approach to jurisdiction)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Robert Lippolis v. Commissioner
Court Name: United States Tax Court
Date Published: Nov 20, 2014
Citations: 143 T.C. 393; 143 T.C. No. 20; 18172-12W
Docket Number: 18172-12W
Court Abbreviation: Tax Ct.
Log In
    Robert Lippolis v. Commissioner, 143 T.C. 393