History
  • No items yet
midpage
Riscatti v. Prime Properties Ltd. Partnership
2012 Ohio 2941
Ohio Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Explosion on August 29, 2009 in the Riscatti home basement caused by gasoline vapors from underground storage tanks and drain pipes connected to a Marathon station sewer main.
  • Drain pipes installed in 1982 allegedly allowed groundwater contaminated with gasoline to be discharged into Parma's sanitary sewer main, especially during heavy rain.
  • Parma owns the public sewer lines; since May 1, 2008 the County provided mainline cleaning/televising and maintenance services; the Sewer District furnishes maintenance only if contracted.
  • Plaintiffs allege odors since 1982 and failure by Parma, the Sewer District, and the County to inspect or address the contamination; the gas station was ordered closed and tanks capped in 2009.
  • Plaintiffs sued Marathon entities, Parma, the Sewer District, the County, and others; Parma moved for judgment on the pleadings—challenging statute of limitations and sovereign immunity; trial court denied; Parma appeals.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Statute of limitations governs suit against Parma Riscatti contends accrual and tolling under 2744.04. Parma argues time bar under 2744.04. Appellate lacked jurisdiction to review immunity/limitations denial; no final appealable order.
Whether Parma is immune under R.C. 2744.02(B)(2) for alleged maintenance of sewer Plaintiffs allege negligent maintenance qualifies as a proprietary function. Parma claims governmental function; immunity applies unless exceptions. Complaint alleges negligent maintenance (proprietary function); immunity exception applies; judgment affirmed.

Key Cases Cited

  • Sampson v. Cuyahoga Metro. Hous. Auth., 2010-Ohio-1214 (8th Dist.) (discusses finality of immunity-denial orders under 2744.02(C))
  • Summerville v. Forest Park, 2010-Ohio-6280 (Ohio Supreme) (role of 2744.04 as a special statute over general limits; immunity context)
  • Hubbell v. Xenia, 2007-Ohio-4839 (Ohio Supreme) (finality of immunity-denial orders under 2744.02(C))
  • Essman v. Portsmouth, 2010-Ohio-4837 (4th Dist.) (design vs. maintenance distinction for sewer-defendant immunity)
  • Summerville v. Forest Park, 128 Ohio St.3d 221, 2010-Ohio-6280 (Ohio Supreme) (explanation of 2744.02(C) and policy goals)
  • Coleman v. Portage Cty. Engineer, 2010-Ohio-6255 (11th Dist.) (continuing violation doctrine context for immunity/limitations)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Riscatti v. Prime Properties Ltd. Partnership
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jun 28, 2012
Citation: 2012 Ohio 2941
Docket Number: 97254
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.