History
  • No items yet
midpage
134 Conn. App. 422
Conn. App. Ct.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Plaintiffs allege city officials allowed five lieutenant examination candidates who lacked requisite time in grade to sit for the exam.
  • Five candidates included two African-Americans, one Hispanic, and two Caucasians.
  • Plaintiffs assert §1983 due process/equal protection, contract, state constitutional, and intentional infliction claims.
  • Defendants moved for summary judgment on June 1, 2010; hearing held September 7, 2010.
  • Court did not issue a decision within 120 days; plaintiffs sought reassignment under Practice Book §11-19; court denied reassignment.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the court violated Practice Book §11-19 by not reassessing within 120 days Reassignment required when 120 days elapsed Potential waiver or extra time justified delay Court erred; reassignment must be granted absent waiver
Whether January 3, 2011 proceeding constituted a hearing extending the 120-day period January 3 proceeding was a hearing No hearing; only argument opportunity, thus no extension Not a hearing; no extension of 120 days
Whether plaintiffs waived the 120-day deadline No waiver; counsel did not intend to relinquish rights Counsel’s conduct suggested waiver No waiver established; timely reassignment proper
Whether the court was required to grant the motion for reassignment once timely filed Absent waiver, §11-19(a) requires reassignment Court could deny if waiver/unavailability Absent waiver, court must grant reassignment
Scope of the court's duties on reassignment under §11-19 Right to reassignment triggered by timely filing Discretionary considerations possible Court must reassign when timely filed and no waiver

Key Cases Cited

  • Dietzel v. Planning Commission, 60 Conn.App. 153 (2000) (hearing definition and nature of proceedings)
  • Dortenzio v. Freedom of Information Commission, 48 Conn.App. 424 (1998) (hearing concept; adversarial proceedings)
  • LLP Mortgage, Ltd. v. Lynch, 122 Conn. App. 686 (2010) (waiver and 120-day time limitations; reassignment rights)
  • Irving v. Firehouse Associates, LLC, 95 Conn.App. 713 (2006) (practice book 11-19 waiver interpretation)
  • Byars v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc., 101 Conn. App. 44 (2007) (statutory interpretation and waiver principles)
  • Stewart v. Tunxis Service Center, 237 Conn. 71 (1996) (mandatory interpretation of ‘shall’ in statutes)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Reyes v. City of Bridgeport
Court Name: Connecticut Appellate Court
Date Published: Mar 27, 2012
Citations: 134 Conn. App. 422; 39 A.3d 771; 2012 WL 917500; 2012 Conn. App. LEXIS 153; AC 33239
Docket Number: AC 33239
Court Abbreviation: Conn. App. Ct.
Log In
    Reyes v. City of Bridgeport, 134 Conn. App. 422