History
  • No items yet
midpage
395 P.3d 977
Or. Ct. App.
2017
Read the full case

Background

  • Landlord brought a forcible entry and unlawful detainer action under ORS 90.427(3) to evict tenants from residential property.
  • Trial court dismissed the case after landlord or his counsel failed to appear at the scheduled 9:00 a.m. trial with 33 minutes of delay.
  • Landlord moved under ORCP 71 B(1) to set aside the dismissal as due to excusable neglect or mistake.
  • Evidence in support consisted of a three-paragraph attorney declaration stating clerk calendared 9:00 a.m. as 10:00 a.m. and landlord appeared at 10:00 a.m.
  • Trial court granted the motion to set aside the judgment based on excusable neglect.
  • Tenants appealed, arguing the evidence failed to prove a reasonable excuse; the court reversed and remanded for reentry of the dismissal judgment.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether landlord proved excusable neglect as a reasonable excuse. Landlord relied on clerk’s calendaring error as excusable neglect. Landlord provided insufficient facts on how the error occurred and its impact. No; evidence insufficient to show a reasonable excuse.
Whether the totality of circumstances supports relief from judgment. Totality supports excusable neglect given calendaring mistake. Record lacks sufficient context of steps taken to avoid such errors. Not established; evidence incomplete to assess totality.
Whether the court erred by granting relief without adequate evidence of procedures to prevent errors. Procedural safeguards existed; relied on them. Lack of information about safeguards and prior incidents undermines reliance. Reversed; remand to reinstate dismissal judgment.

Key Cases Cited

  • Union Lumber Co. v. Miller, 360 Or 767 (Or. 2017) (requires reasonable excuse for failure to appear; totality of circumstances review)
  • Hiatt v. Congoleum Industries, 279 Or 569 (Or. 1977) (excusable neglect standard; reasonableness of excuse)
  • PGE v. Ebasco Services, Inc., 263 Or App 53 (Or. App. 2014) (burden on movant to show excusable neglect; incomplete evidence defeats relief)
  • Wagar v. Prudential Ins. Co., 276 Or 827 (Or. 1976) (reasonableness of precautions and procedures in avoiding neglect)
  • Reeves v. Farber, 284 Or App 887 (Or. App. 2017) (analyses multiple trials setting and related diligence in calendaring)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Reeves v. Plett
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Oregon
Date Published: Apr 19, 2017
Citations: 395 P.3d 977; 284 Or. App. 852; 2017 Ore. App. LEXIS 491; 16LT00515; A161806
Docket Number: 16LT00515; A161806
Court Abbreviation: Or. Ct. App.
Log In