History
  • No items yet
midpage
Razka v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
14-1224
Fed. Cl.
Jul 24, 2017
Read the full case

Background

  • Petitioner Gregory Razka filed a Vaccine Program petition alleging Guillain–Barré Syndrome after a May 25, 2013 DTaP vaccination; compensation was awarded by stipulation and decision on April 20, 2017.
  • After entitlement, petitioner sought attorneys’ fees of $51,875.50 and costs of $19,380.69 (total $71,256.19); respondent did not object to specific amounts but asked the Special Master to determine a reasonable award.
  • Petitioner’s counsel (Shannon Law Group) is based in Woodridge, Illinois (DuPage County), part of the Chicago metropolitan area; the Special Master ordered evidence on appropriate local/forum rates.
  • The Special Master applied the Vaccine Act fee standards and McCulloch/forum-rate framework, concluding Chicago-area forum rates apply here.
  • The Special Master awarded Mr. Shannon $350/hour (lower end of his McCulloch range due to lack of Vaccine Program experience) and treated Cummings (not admitted to the Court of Federal Claims) as non-attorney/paralegal work at $125/hour.
  • Because billing included clerical tasks and time spent learning Vaccine Program basics, the Special Master reduced the adjusted attorney-fee total by 10%, awarding $37,656.00 in attorneys’ fees and $19,380.69 in costs, for a total award of $57,036.69 payable jointly to petitioner and counsel.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Appropriate forum vs. local hourly rates Counsel sought forum (Chicago/DC-area) rates for work performed from Woodridge, IL Respondent deferred to Special Master to set a reasonable award (no specific objection) Forum rates apply because Woodridge is in the Chicago metro area; forum rates awarded
Proper hourly rate for lead counsel (Shannon) Requested $415/hr (top of McCulloch range for years of admission) Respondent did not contest rate; Special Master must set reasonable rate $350/hr awarded (lower end of McCulloch range due to lack of Vaccine Program experience)
Compensation for non-admitted attorney (Cummings) Time billed at attorney rates Cummings not admitted to CFC bar; non-admitted attorneys cannot recover attorney fees Cummings’ work compensated at non-attorney (paralegal) rate $125/hr
Reasonableness of hours billed (clerical tasks, learning curve) Counsel billed for meetings, travel arrangements, administrative work and time learning Vaccine Program Respondent raised no specific entries but urged Special Master discretion 10% across-the-board reduction of adjusted attorney-fee total for excessive/clerical and learning-related entries

Key Cases Cited

  • Avera v. Secretary of Health & Human Services, 515 F.3d 1343 (Fed. Cir. 2008) (endorses lodestar approach in Vaccine Program fee awards)
  • Blum v. Stenson, 465 U.S. 886 (1984) (defines reasonable hourly rate as prevailing community rate)
  • Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424 (1983) (hours must be reasonable; exclude excessive or redundant time)
  • Davis County Solid Waste Mgmt. & Energy Recovery Special Serv. Dist. v. United States EPA, 169 F.3d 755 (D.C. Cir. 1999) (basis for forum-rate exceptions)
  • Sebelius v. Cloer, 133 S. Ct. 1886 (2013) (fee award follows success on merits under Vaccine Act)
  • Broekelschen v. Secretary of Health & Human Services, 102 Fed. Cl. 719 (2011) (upholding percentage reductions and discretion of Special Master on fee reductions)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Razka v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
Court Name: United States Court of Federal Claims
Date Published: Jul 24, 2017
Docket Number: 14-1224
Court Abbreviation: Fed. Cl.