Raines v. State
304 Ga. 582
Ga.2018Background
- In December 2011 Brandy Guined was shot in Thomaston; she later died at a hospital. A purse with cash was found on her.
- Dantazias Raines was indicted in Upson County for malice murder, related felonies, and three misdemeanor obstruction counts; tried March 2013 and convicted on all counts; sentenced to life without parole plus additional years.
- Key eyewitness: Marquerious Traylor (accompanied Raines, admitted they planned a robbery, recorded a conversation in which Raines allegedly confessed); other witnesses (Dawson, Searcy) recounted Raines’ statements placing him at/near the scene.
- Some physical evidence (projectile and a recovered .380 pistol) was labeled with “Upson County” on evidence bags; a notebook from the cab referenced Avenue N but its contents were excluded for lack of foundation.
- Trial rulings: certain evidence excluded (victim’s notebook contents, parts of Raines’ custodial statement suppressed for Miranda violations); recordings were played for the jury though not formally admitted as exhibits in the jury room.
- On appeal Raines challenged venue (overall and for obstruction counts), sufficiency/corroboration of accomplice testimony, omission of an accomplice-corroboration jury charge, admission/presentation of recordings, and his sentence; the Court affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for resentencing under Veal.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument (State) | Defendant's Argument (Raines) | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Venue for homicide counts | Venue established by testimony placing shooting on Avenue N in Thomaston and by investigative steps to Avenue N; labels on evidence bags and GBI testimony tied evidence to Upson County | Venue not proved—no witness directly identified county of occurrence; notebook contents excluded; evidence labels insufficient | Affirmed: viewing evidence in light most favorable to verdict, venue for murder counts was proved in Upson County |
| Venue for misdemeanor obstruction counts | Venue can be inferred from involvement of Upson County task force and transport to Upson jail | Obstruction testimony lacked any specific location tying acts to Upson County | Reversed as to obstruction counts: State failed to prove venue for those misdemeanors |
| Corroboration of accomplice (Traylor) testimony | Multiple independent facts corroborate: Raines’ own statements to Dawson/Searcy, cash found on victim, Raines’ flight/resistance at arrest, and demeanor—sufficient “slight” corroboration | Traylor was an accomplice; his testimony required independent corroboration and some inculpatory evidence played derived from Traylor | Affirmed: slight independent corroboration existed; jury could find guilt beyond reasonable doubt |
| Failure to charge on accomplice corroboration | Jury instructed on venue, reasonable doubt, credibility; State argues instruction on corroboration not required when defense theory and overall charge fairly present issues | Raines contends omission was reversible error because his defense relied on lack of corroboration | No plain error: omission did not likely affect outcome given overall instructions and quantum of evidence |
| Recordings played but not formally admitted | Recordings were played (some redacted) with court oversight; State says no harm because recordings were handled and not sent to jury room | Raines argues publishing recordings without tender/admission was error | No plain error: Raines failed to show prejudice from recordings being played but not formally admitted |
Key Cases Cited
- Jones v. State, 272 Ga. 900 (addresses standard for proving venue after plea of not guilty)
- Pike v. State, 302 Ga. 795 (frame for viewing venue evidence like sufficiency review)
- Twitty v. State, 298 Ga. 204 (discusses need for an appropriate venue instruction tailored to facts)
- Veal v. State, 298 Ga. 691 (sentence-remand principles relied on for resentencing)
- Huff v. State, 300 Ga. 807 (explains slight corroboration standard for accomplice testimony)
- Cowart v. State, 294 Ga. 333 (evidence sufficiency review includes all admitted evidence; retrial on venue failure possible)
