History
  • No items yet
midpage
320 P.3d 1084
Utah Ct. App.
2014
Read the full case

Background

  • RP., alleged father, petitions to establish paternity under the Utah Uniform Parentage Act (UUPA).
  • Wife KS.W. and Husband are married; Wife had an affair with RP. and became pregnant.
  • The parties entered a mediated settlement agreement (the Agreement) and filed a stipulation in January 2011.
  • Wife later moved to set aside the Agreement and to dismiss RP.'s petition; Husband joined as a party; Wife withdrew her counterpetition.
  • The district court dismissed RP.'s petition as lacking standing; RP. appealed, with the appeal treated as a summary-judgment matter.
  • The court held RP. lacked standing under the UUPA to challenge the presumed father, and preemption of common law Schoolcraft analysis by the UUPA.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether RP. has standing to challenge the presumed paternity under the UUPA RP. argues common law Schoolcraft applies and grants standing Husband and Wife contend standing is limited by UUPA §607 to the presumed father and the mother RP. lacks standing under the UUPA
Whether the UUPA preempts the common-law Schoolcraft standing analysis Schoolcraft should apply if not preempted by statute UUPA preempts Schoolcraft; standing limited to presumed father and mother UUPA preempts Schoolcraft; standing limited to the presumed father and the mother
Effect of Wife's counterpetition on RP.'s standing Wife's counterpetition admissions would give RP. standing Counterpetition and Agreement lacked binding adjudication of paternity; does not create standing Wife's counterpetition does not confer standing to RP.
Whether the district court properly dismissed RP.'s petition given the proceedings at issue District court should consider Schoolcraft factors for standing District court correctly dismissed as RP. had no standing under the UUPA District court's dismissal affirmed

Key Cases Cited

  • In re J.W.F. (Schooleraft), 799 P.2d 710 (Utah 1990) (established standing considerations for presumptive paternity)
  • Balentine v. Gehring, 164 P.3d 1269 (Utah Ct. App. 2007) (pre-UUPA standing analysis; noted Schoolcraft considerations)
  • Pearson II, 182 P.3d 353 (Utah 2008) (discussed standing under Schoolcraft post-UUPA)
  • In re Estate of Hannifin, 311 P.3d 1016 (Utah 2018) (preemption analysis of common law by UUPA)
  • State v. Watkins, 309 P.3d 209 (Utah 2013) (statutory interpretation and legislative intent guidance)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: R.P. v. K.S.W.
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Utah
Date Published: Feb 21, 2014
Citations: 320 P.3d 1084; 2014 UT App 38; No. 20120559-CA
Docket Number: No. 20120559-CA
Court Abbreviation: Utah Ct. App.
Log In
    R.P. v. K.S.W., 320 P.3d 1084