History
  • No items yet
midpage
Pielhau v. State Farm Mutual Auto Ins. Co.
314 P.3d 698
N.M. Ct. App.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Jared Pielhau died in a 2004 single-car accident; vehicle was uninsured and five Pielhau vehicles were insured by State Farm.
  • In 2004, Pielhaus sought UM coverage under two State Farm policies for the accident; a suit against State Farm and an agent was settled and dismissed with prejudice.
  • The three Chevrolet policies’ UM/UIM rejection forms were not pursued by Pielhaus in 2004 and were first addressed in 2011.
  • In 2011, after State Farm did not respond to a UM claim demand, Pielhaus filed suit seeking declaratory judgment, damages, and punitive damages; district court granted partial summary judgment for Pielhaus on reformation of policies.
  • State Farm appeals, arguing, among other things, that claim preclusion bars the 2011 claims.
  • The Court of Appeals held that claim preclusion bars the 2011 claims because the 2004 suit was a final adjudication on the merits and involved the same transaction and related conduct.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Does claim preclusion bar the 2011 UM claims? Pielhaus contends 2011 claims were not precluded by the 2004 settlement. State Farm argues the 2004 dismissal with prejudice and settlement preclude all related claims arising from the same accident. Yes; claims barred by claim preclusion.

Key Cases Cited

  • Jordan v. Allstate Insurance Co., 2010-NMSC-051 (N.M. 2010) (retroactivity of UM/UIM procedures for rejection of coverage)
  • Weed Warrior Services v. Progressive Northwestern Insurance Co., 2010-NMSC-050 (N.M. 2010) (uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage procedures)
  • Rosette, Inc. v. United State Dep’t of the Interior, 2007-NMCA-136 (N.M. Ct. App. 2007) (determinants of claim preclusion; transactional approach)
  • Three Rivers Land Co. v. Maddoux, 1982-NMSC-111 (N.M. 1982) (transactional approach to prior claims; convenience of trial unit)
  • Kirby v. Guardian Life Insurance Company of America, 2010-NMSC-014 (N.M. 2010) (dismissal with prejudice as adjudication on the merits for res judicata)
  • Hope Cmty. Ditch Ass’n v. N.M. State Eng’r, 2005-NMCA-002 (N.M. Ct. App. 2005) (consent judgments and collateral estoppel considerations)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Pielhau v. State Farm Mutual Auto Ins. Co.
Court Name: New Mexico Court of Appeals
Date Published: Sep 23, 2013
Citation: 314 P.3d 698
Docket Number: 31,899
Court Abbreviation: N.M. Ct. App.