History
  • No items yet
midpage
Pesoli v. Department of Employment Security
983 N.E.2d 1
Ill. App. Ct.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Pesoli was employed as a department secretary at Advocate Lutheran General Hospital from Aug 1997 until a Sept 28, 2009 discharge.
  • Discharged for accessing a patient’s records not related to her job in the radiation oncology department, violating the hospital’s confidentiality policy and HIPAA.
  • Advocate’s confidentiality policy requires access only for job-related purposes and warns of termination for wrongful use or disclosure.
  • Audit logs showed Pesoli accessed a neighbor patient’s records; a coworker complaint prompted the audit.
  • Pesoli admitted awareness of the policy and testified the access was not work-related; the Board found misconduct under 602(A).
  • The Board affirmed the referee’s decision; the circuit court and now the appellate court uphold that decision.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Pesoli committed misconduct under 602(A) Pesoli argues the evidence doesn't prove willful policy violation Board finds deliberate, willful breach of confidentiality policy Yes; conduct was willful and in violation of policy, constituting misconduct
Sufficiency and credibility of evidence supporting misconduct Arguments about missing witness and missing audit records were not raised below Evidence of admission and audit logs corroborates misconduct Evidence supports Board’s finding of misconduct
Hearsay and procedural issues on admitted testimony Hearsay testimony should be excluded Not reversible; hearsay properly admitted without objection and corroborated by other evidence

Key Cases Cited

  • Czajka v. Department of Employment Security, 387 Ill. App. 3d 168 (Ill. App. 1st Dist. 2008) (elements of misconduct under 602(A))
  • Livingston v. Department of Employment Security, 375 Ill. App. 3d 710 (Ill. App. 1st Dist. 2007) (willful violation requires awareness and disregard of rule)
  • Bandemer v. Department of Employment Security, 204 Ill. App. 3d 192 (Ill. App. 1st Dist. 1990) (reasonableness of employer rule)
  • HIPAA-related confidentiality rule case, (Illinois appellate treatment cited) () (reasonableness of confidentiality policy under HIPAA cited in analysis)
  • Abbott Industries, Inc. v. Department of Employment Security, 2011 IL App (2d) 100610 (Ill. App. 2d 2011) (standard for reviewing agency findings of fact)
  • Hurst v. Department of Employment Security, 393 Ill. App. 3d 323 (Ill. App. 4th Dist. 2009) (consideration of potential harm and evidence weight)
  • City of Belvidere v. Illinois State Labor Relations Board, 181 Ill. 2d 191 (Ill. 1998) (mixed questions of fact and law; standard of review)
  • Caterpillar, Inc. v. Doherty, 299 Ill. App. 3d 338 (Ill. App. 1st Dist. 1998) (Board as ultimate finder of fact; credibility weighing)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Pesoli v. Department of Employment Security
Court Name: Appellate Court of Illinois
Date Published: Dec 19, 2012
Citation: 983 N.E.2d 1
Docket Number: 1-11-1835
Court Abbreviation: Ill. App. Ct.