History
  • No items yet
midpage
55 Cal. 4th 694
Cal.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Reginald Wyatt died from shock and hemorrhage due to blunt force trauma while in defendant Reginald Wyatt's care.
  • Defendant was convicted of involuntary manslaughter and assault on a child causing death (273ab) after a jury trial; murder conviction was acquitted.
  • Court of Appeal reversed the 273ab conviction, ruling the trial court erred in not sua sponte instructing on simple assault as a lesser included offense.
  • This Court previously remanded, holding that the defendant could be liable for assault if the evidence showed awareness of facts making a battery likely to cause great bodily injury under Williams.
  • On review, the Court agrees there was no sua sponte duty to instruct on simple assault, but reverses the Court of Appeal and reinstates the 273ab conviction.
  • The opinion discusses the statutory elements of 273ab and the standard for lesser included offenses, largely following Williams and related precedents.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the trial court erred sua sponte by omitting simple assault instruction Wyatt: instructional error required Wyatt: no error; evidence insufficient for lesser offense No reversible error; no duty to give sua sponte instruction
Whether substantial evidence supports convicting only simple assault Wyatt: record could support simple assault instead of 273ab Wyatt: record supports greater offense; not limited to simple assault Evidence did not show only simple assault; trial court not obligated to instruct
Appropriate standard for lesser included offense instructions Wyatt: Williams standard permits lesser offense instruction when evidence supports it Wyatt: instruction not required unless substantial evidence of lesser offense exists Instruction not required; substantial evidence did not justify lesser offense

Key Cases Cited

  • People v. Williams, 26 Cal.4th 779 (Cal. 2001) (defines assault mental state: actual knowledge of facts, not required to prove intent to injure)
  • People v. Taylor, 48 Cal.4th 574 (Cal. 2010) (limits sua sponte lesser offense instructions to substantial evidence)
  • People v. Thomas, 53 Cal.4th 771 (Cal. 2012) (affirms lesser offense instruction standard)
  • People v. Huggins, 38 Cal.4th 175 (Cal. 2006) (limits necessity of instructing on lesser offenses)
  • People v. Breverman, 19 Cal.4th 142 (Cal. 1998) (requires substantial evidence for lesser included offenses; credibility reserved for jury)
  • People v. Cox, 23 Cal.4th 665 (Cal. 2000) (defines unlawful attempt constituting simple assault elements)
  • People v. Basuta, 94 Cal.App.4th 370 (Cal. App. 2001) (treats simple assault as a lesser included offense of 273ab)
  • People v. Wyatt, 48 Cal.4th 776 (Cal. 2010) (origin of 273ab interpretation; discusses child abuse homicide terminology)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Wyatt
Court Name: California Supreme Court
Date Published: Nov 5, 2012
Citations: 55 Cal. 4th 694; 287 P.3d 78; 148 Cal. Rptr. 3d 508; 2012 WL 5382468; 2012 Cal. LEXIS 10087; S189786
Docket Number: S189786
Court Abbreviation: Cal.
Log In
    People v. Wyatt, 55 Cal. 4th 694