History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Teague
2013 IL App (1st) 110349
Ill. App. Ct.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Teague murdered his former employer Marcus Hendricks and attempted to murder three police officers while fleeing police.
  • He used an AK-47 semiautomatic rifle and fired from about 40 feet away.
  • Jurors found Hendricks murdered and three officers were attempted murder victims; Teague personally discharged the firearm.
  • Sentencing: 85 years for murder plus a 25-year firearm enhancement, and 50 years for each attempted murder, running concurrently but consecutive to murder, totaling 135 years.
  • On appeal Teague challenges sufficiency of intent for the attempted murders and the length of the sentence.
  • The court affirms both the convictions and the 135-year sentence.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Sufficiency of intent to kill for attempted murder People argues intent to kill can be inferred from firing at officers. Teague argues shots did not hit officers or vehicle, lacking intent to kill. Sufficiency upheld; intent inferred from firing at officers despite misses.
Whether the 135-year sentence is an abuse of discretion People contends the sentence reflects seriousness and aggravation. Teague contends rehabilitation and mitigating factors were undervalued. Sentence affirmed; not an abuse of discretion.

Key Cases Cited

  • People v. Green, 339 Ill. App. 3d 443 (2003) (intent to kill may be inferred from surrounding circumstances)
  • People v. Parker, 311 Ill. App. 3d 80 (1999) (intent to kill inferred from surrounding circumstances)
  • People v. Williams, 165 Ill. 2d 51 (1995) (circumstantial evidence of intent sufficiency rules)
  • People v. Ephraim, 323 Ill. App. 3d 1097 (2001) (intent to kill may be inferred from firing at targets)
  • People v. Bailey, 265 Ill. App. 3d 262 (1994) (conduct firing toward crowds supports intent to kill)
  • People v. Jackson, 232 Ill. 2d 246 (2009) (standard for reviewing sufficiency of evidence; do not substitute judgment)
  • Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (1979) (standard for due process sufficiency of evidence)
  • People v. Alexander, 239 Ill. 2d 205 (2010) (reconsideration of rehabilitation vs. seriousness of offense; deference to trial court)
  • In re Stern, 124 Ill. 2d 310 (1988) (sufficiency of evidence and state of mind issues)
  • People v. Green (duplicate citation), 339 Ill. App. 3d 443 (2003) (see above)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Teague
Court Name: Appellate Court of Illinois
Date Published: Feb 15, 2013
Citation: 2013 IL App (1st) 110349
Docket Number: 1-11-0349
Court Abbreviation: Ill. App. Ct.