History
  • No items yet
midpage
D083157
Cal. Ct. App.
Dec 20, 2024
Read the full case

Background

  • Colton Jay Simpson was convicted in 2007 for robbery, evading a police officer, commercial burglary, and grand theft, with multiple serious felony and prison prior enhancements.
  • Simpson was originally sentenced as a third-striker to 50 years to life plus 16 years, mostly due to these enhancements.
  • Subsequent changes in California law invalidated certain enhancements for prior prison terms not related to sexually violent offenses, prompting a resentencing.
  • In a 2023 resentencing, the trial court reduced Simpson's sentence to 50 years to life plus five years, striking most enhancements but retaining one prior serious felony enhancement.
  • Simpson appealed, arguing errors in the trial court’s reliance on his memoir, its application of sentencing discretion, and the admission of his book as evidence at the sentencing.

Issues

Issue Simpson’s Argument State's Argument Held
Whether the court relied on incorrect facts from Simpson’s book at resentencing The court misinterpreted the timing and context of facts in his book The court properly considered the timing and content of the book No error; court relied on correct facts
Whether the court failed to consider required statutory postconviction factors The court omitted or misapplied required statutory and mitigating factors The court had discretion and did consider the relevant factors No error; court acted within discretion
Whether the trial court erred by admitting Simpson’s book at sentencing Admission was improper without analysis under Evidence Code § 352.2 Simpson forfeited the claim by not objecting below and invited its admission Claim forfeited and invited error

Key Cases Cited

  • People v. Superior Court (Romero), 13 Cal.4th 497 (Cal. 1996) (establishes trial court’s discretion to strike prior strikes for sentencing)
  • People v. Williams, 17 Cal.4th 148 (Cal. 1998) (sets standard for when a defendant is outside the spirit of the Three Strikes law)
  • People v. Carmony, 33 Cal.4th 367 (Cal. 2004) (details abuse of discretion standard in Three Strikes sentencing)
  • People v. Zackery, 147 Cal.App.4th 380 (Cal. Ct. App. 2007) (oral pronouncement of judgment controls over minute order)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Simpson CA4/1
Court Name: California Court of Appeal
Date Published: Dec 20, 2024
Citation: D083157
Docket Number: D083157
Court Abbreviation: Cal. Ct. App.
Log In