People v. Scott CA1/3
A168721
Cal. Ct. App.Mar 11, 2025Background
- Orville Marquis Scott was convicted in California of possessing a firearm as a felon (Penal Code § 29800) following an attempted residential robbery in San Francisco.
- Scott’s predicate felony convictions came from Missouri (various forms of theft and delivery of a controlled substance).
- He filed a pretrial motion to dismiss the charge of possession of a firearm by a felon, claiming it violated his rights under both the Equal Protection Clause and the Second Amendment.
- The trial court denied his motion; the jury convicted him of the firearm possession and one count of assault with a firearm, but deadlocked on other counts.
- On appeal, Scott challenged the constitutionality of § 29800 as applied to him as a nonviolent felon, and also argued that its distinction between federal and out-of-state convictions violated equal protection.
Issues
| Issue | Scott's Argument | State's (People's) Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Second Amendment challenge to § 29800 as-applied | Prohibiting Scott (as nonviolent felon) from firearm possession violates the Second Amendment post-Bruen. | The statute is consistent with historical tradition and longstanding precedent upholding the ban on felons possessing firearms. | Court found Scott's as-applied challenge forfeited, and even if not, prohibition is constitutional for both violent and nonviolent felons. |
| Equal Protection (federal vs. state felonies) | Section 29800(c) treats those with non-California state convictions differently than those with federal convictions without sufficient justification. | Distinctions are rational because assessing out-of-state felonies would be overly burdensome for courts; rational basis review applies. | No equal protection violation; rational basis supports the legislative distinction. |
| Facial Second Amendment challenge | Prohibition on all felons possessing firearms is unconstitutional on its face. | Longstanding precedent holds such prohibitions "presumptively lawful." | Section 29800 is constitutional on its face. |
| Facial Equal Protection challenge | Statute is invalid for all similarly situated persons. | Same as above. | Failures as-applied defeats facial attack; statute upheld. |
Key Cases Cited
- District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008) (Second Amendment guarantees individual right but allows longstanding prohibitions on possession by felons)
- McDonald v. City of Chicago, 561 U.S. 742 (2010) (incorporated Second Amendment against the states, reaffirming felon prohibitions)
- New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n v. Bruen, 597 U.S. 1 (2022) (clarified analytical framework for Second Amendment challenges, maintaining felon prohibitions as valid)
- Heller v. Doe, 509 U.S. 312 (1993) (articulates rational basis review in equal protection cases)
- People v. Turnage, 55 Cal.4th 62 (Ca. 2012) (broad legislative discretion in classifications under rational basis review)
