People v. Schultz
134 N.E.3d 1
Ill. App. Ct.2019Background
- Robert Schultz was charged with unlawful use/possession of a weapon by a felon (UUWF) and other weapon offenses after an officer observed him discard a handgun during a field interview.
- At trial the parties stipulated Schultz had prior felony convictions in Wayne County, Michigan: ‘‘assault with a dangerous weapon’’ and ‘‘carrying a firearm while committing or attempting to commit a felony’’ under case no. 12-009438.
- The stipulation did not identify the precise Michigan statute, though Schultz’s PSI and Michigan criminal-history records showed conviction under Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.82 (felonious assault/assault with a dangerous weapon).
- The trial court found Schultz guilty and sentenced him on the UUWF count as a Class 2 offender (enhanced because of a prior “forcible felony”), imposing four years’ imprisonment.
- On appeal Schultz argued the State failed to prove a prior “forcible felony” under 720 ILCS 5/2-8 because the stipulated Michigan offenses are not enumerated and the State offered no particulars to show they fit the residual clause (i.e., involved use or threat of physical force).
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether a stipulated out-of-state conviction for "assault with a dangerous weapon" qualifies as a "forcible felony" under section 2-8's residual clause, supporting Class 2 UUWF enhancement. | The Michigan felonious-assault statute (§ 750.82) and Michigan case law make assault-with-weapon inherently violent; thus the stipulation alone suffices to show a prior forcible felony. | The stipulation lacked statutory citation or factual details; without proof that the prior offense involved force or threat, the State failed to show a forcible felony and enhancement cannot stand. | The court held the Michigan § 750.82 conviction (assault with a dangerous weapon/felonious assault) is inherently a forcible felony under § 2-8, so enhancement to Class 2 stands. |
Key Cases Cited
- People v. Thompson, 238 Ill. 2d 598 (explains plain-error review framework)
- People v. Belk, 203 Ill. 2d 187 (defines when unenumerated felony qualifies as forcible felony under facts)
- People v. Thomas, 407 Ill. App. 3d 136 (elemental analysis can show certain crimes are inherently forcible felonies)
- People v. Carmichael, 343 Ill. App. 3d 855 (held prior stipulated conviction insufficient to prove forcible felony where offense not inherently violent)
- People v. Gardner, 265 N.W.2d 1 (Mich.) (approved definitions of assault used to interpret Michigan assault law)
- People v. Johnson, 284 N.W.2d 718 (Mich.) (holds felonious-assault jury must find intent to injure or to place victim in reasonable apprehension)
- People v. Nix, 836 N.W.2d 224 (Mich. Ct. App.) (describes elements of assault with a dangerous weapon under § 750.82)
- People v. Bosca, 871 N.W.2d 307 (Mich. Ct. App.) (uses terminology and elements for assault with a dangerous weapon under Michigan law)
