History
  • No items yet
midpage
A172132
Cal. Ct. App.
Aug 25, 2025
Read the full case

Background

  • Nathan Medina was convicted in 2009 of first-degree murder, two counts of attempted premeditated murder, and first-degree burglary, receiving a sentence of 40 years plus 50 years to life in prison.
  • The convictions stemmed from Medina's entry into Beverly Rhoads's home where he shot and killed Joshua Rhoads and attempted to kill Beverly Rhoads and another resident following a dispute involving a construction project.
  • Medina's direct appeal of his conviction was previously affirmed by the court.
  • In August 2024, Medina filed a petition for resentencing under Penal Code section 1172.6, citing changes to the law of murder made by Senate Bill No. 1437 (limiting vicarious liability for murder).
  • The trial court denied Medina’s petition, finding he was the actual killer and thus ineligible for section 1172.6 resentencing relief.
  • Medina appealed the denial, arguing trial error, bias, and the potential relevance of other recent ameliorative legislation.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Eligibility for resentencing under § 1172.6 Medina was the actual killer, ineligible for relief Jury was instructed on felony murder, so verdict could be based on vicarious liability Medina ineligible for resentencing; record showed he was actual killer
Consideration of unrelated ameliorative legislation Not relevant to § 1172.6 eligibility Recent legislation should support resentencing Other statutes not applicable at the prima facie stage
Claims of trial error and judicial bias Not raised; focus on statutory ineligibility Supplemental brief alleges errors and bias Claims not reviewable or unsupported, not properly before court
Factfinding at prima facie stage Record establishes actual killer status Court improperly engaged in factfinding No improper factfinding; decision based solely on record

Key Cases Cited

  • People v. Hin, 17 Cal.5th 401 (Cal. 2025) (Senate Bill No. 1437 limited vicarious liability for murder)
  • People v. Antonelli, 17 Cal.5th 719 (Cal. 2025) (procedure under section 1172.6 for resentencing those convicted under prior law)
  • People v. Strong, 13 Cal.5th 698 (Cal. 2022) (resentencing under § 1172.6 unavailable for actual killer)
  • People v. Lewis, 11 Cal.5th 952 (Cal. 2021) (assessing prejudice and harmless error in § 1172.6 context)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Medina CA1/1
Court Name: California Court of Appeal
Date Published: Aug 25, 2025
Citation: A172132
Docket Number: A172132
Court Abbreviation: Cal. Ct. App.
Log In
    People v. Medina CA1/1, A172132