History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Martinez-Huerta
2015 Colo. App. LEXIS 764
Colo. Ct. App.
2015
Read the full case

Background

  • Martinez-Huerta, a Mexican national and lawful permanent resident, pleaded guilty in 2007 to vehicular eluding and admitted a probation-violation on a separate felony; he received concurrent probationary sentences.
  • In August 2013 he was placed in removal proceedings under INA §237(a)(2)(A)(ii) and was ordered removed in December 2018.
  • In 2014 he filed a Crim. P. 35(c) motion to withdraw his plea alleging ineffective assistance of plea counsel, claiming counsel had affirmatively assured him the plea had no immigration consequences.
  • The trial court summarily denied the motion as time-barred under the three-year statutory limitations for collateral attack; Martinez-Huerta appealed the denial of an untimely filing.
  • The appellate court considered whether affirmative, erroneous immigration advice by plea counsel, relied on by the defendant, can constitute "justifiable excuse" or "excusable neglect" to overcome the time bar and warrant a hearing.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Martinez-Huerta pleaded facts entitling him to a hearing on justifiable excuse/excusable neglect for an untimely Crim. P. 35(c) motion He relied on plea counsel's explicit assurance that the plea had no immigration consequences, so he reasonably delayed collateral attack until removal proceedings revealed the error Trial court: motion is time-barred; no sufficient excuse shown to require a hearing Reversed and remanded for a hearing on justifiable excuse/excusable neglect; if found, court must reach merits of 35(c) motion

Key Cases Cited

  • Close v. People, 180 P.3d 1015 (Colo. 2008) (standards for entitlement to a hearing on time-bar exceptions)
  • People v. Wiedemer, 852 P.2d 424 (Colo. 1993) (factors for evaluating justifiable excuse/excusable neglect)
  • People v. Pozo, 746 P.2d 523 (Colo. 1987) (attorney duty to advise non-citizen clients on immigration consequences)
  • People v. Alexander, 129 P.3d 1051 (Colo. App. 2005) (failure to advise of time bar does not automatically show justifiable excuse)
  • Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (U.S. 1984) (ineffective-assistance-of-counsel framework)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Martinez-Huerta
Court Name: Colorado Court of Appeals
Date Published: May 21, 2015
Citation: 2015 Colo. App. LEXIS 764
Docket Number: Court of Appeals No. 14CA0578
Court Abbreviation: Colo. Ct. App.