People v. Jones
299 Mich. App. 284
| Mich. Ct. App. | 2013Background
- Defendant Byron Deandre Jones was convicted on three counts of assault with intent to do great bodily harm less than murder, MCL 750.84, plus one count each of carrying a concealed weapon, MCL 750.227, and possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony, MCL 750.227b.
- The incidents arose from a shooting at Eastland Mall in Harper Woods, Michigan, where Jones and another man identified as “Taiwan” confronted another group, drew guns, and Jones fired.
- Jones challenged the trial court’s scoring of 10 points for offense variable (OV) 14 (offender’s role) on the theory that there was no “multiple offender situation.”
- The trial court’s sentencing guidelines scoring is reviewed de novo for interpretation of the statute, with clear-error review for the sufficiency of the evidence.
- The appellate court held OV 14 proper because the record showed a multiple-offender situation involving Jones and Taiwan; thus the court did not err in scoring OV 14.
- The court noted it would not address whether Jones was a “leader” under OV 14 since that issue was not challenged on appeal.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether OV 14 was properly scored as a multiple-offender situation | Jones argues there was no multiple-offender situation | Jones contends only he violated the law | OV 14 properly scored; multiple-offender situation existed and upholds the 10 points |
Key Cases Cited
- People v. McGraw, 484 Mich 120 (2009) (interpretation and application of the sentencing guidelines)
- People v. Hicks, 259 Mich App 518 (2003) (review of sentencing guidelines scoring; evidence supports scoring)
- People v. Hornsby, 251 Mich App 462 (2002) (scoring decisions upheld if supported by evidence)
- People v. Lowe, 484 Mich 718 (2009) (plain meaning of the statute; legislative intent)
- People v. Stone, 463 Mich 558 (2001) (dictionary definitions aid statutory interpretation)
