People v. Grabeck
2011 IL App (2d) 100599
Ill. App. Ct.2011Background
- Defendant Grabeck was DUI arrestee; arrest occurred December 21, 2009.
- Sworn Report filed with the Secretary of State alleged Notice of Summary Suspension was given March 12, 2010.
- Sworn Report failed to indicate the manner of notice (personal vs. by mail) despite boxes for this information.
- Secretary later sent Confirmation of Statutory Summary Suspension indicating suspension beginning April 27, 2010.
- Defendant petitioned to rescind; State sought to amend the Sworn Report to show notice by mail, trial court denied.
- Court held that lack of a notice-manner notation did not mandate rescission; reversed and remanded.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether rescission is required when Sworn Report omits notice manner | Grabeck argues defect in notice-manner warrants rescission. | People contends safe processing despite missing manner box; Donnelly controls. | No rescission required; defect not fatal. |
| Whether trial court erred in denying amendment to reflect mailing notice | State contends amendment necessary to correct defect and align with Rule 12. | Defendant asserts due process; secretary could be misled without amendment. | Not addressed on the merits; remanded for proceedings consistent with this opinion. |
Key Cases Cited
- People v. Donnelly, 327 Ill. App. 3d 1101 (2002) (Sworn Report defect not fatal when date of notice is stated)
- People v. Palacios, 266 Ill. App. 3d 341 (1994) (sworn report failure to indicate service method may warrant rescission)
- People v. Lent, 276 Ill. App. 3d 80 (1995) (scopes of rescission hearing; list of defects)
- People v. Osborn, 184 Ill. App. 3d 728 (1989) (rescission when notice not served)
- People v. Jordan, 336 Ill. App. 3d 288 (2003) (calculation of suspension start date when notice by mail)
- In re J.L., 236 Ill. 2d 329 (2010) (statutory construction rules; de novo review)
- McClain, 128 Ill. 2d 500 (1989) (Sworn Report function analog to civil complaint)
- Bywater, 223 Ill. 2d 477 (2006) (Rule 12 timing; mail service presumptions)
