History
  • No items yet
midpage
2018 COA 27
Colo. Ct. App.
2018
Read the full case

Background

  • Mother was a respondent in a Colorado dependency and neglect proceeding that resulted in termination of parental rights to her child, L.H.
  • Mother initially denied Native American heritage but later said her biological brother was registered with “Navajo–Diné,” without providing enrollment numbers or detailed tribal information.
  • Jefferson County Department of Human Services sent multiple notices only to the Navajo Nation; the Navajo Nation replied that the family was not enrolled or eligible with the Navajo Nation.
  • The Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) publishes lists of federally recognized tribes and lists tribes by historical affiliation; the Colorado River Indian Tribes (CRIT) are listed as historically affiliated with the Navajo.
  • The trial court found ICWA did not apply based on the Navajo Nation’s response; the Court of Appeals concluded the Department should also have notified CRIT and remanded for limited compliance with ICWA notice requirements.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether ICWA notice was sufficient where parent identified only a tribal ancestral group ("Navajo") without specific tribal enrollment details Department (Petitioner) argued notice to the identified tribe (Navajo Nation) satisfied ICWA because the Navajo Nation found no enrollment record Mother (Respondent) argued that identifying an ancestral group required notice to all tribes historically affiliated with that group (including CRIT) Court held notice was insufficient; when only an ancestral group is indicated, the Department must notify all tribes in that ancestral group (including CRIT)

Key Cases Cited

  • Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. Holyfield, 490 U.S. 30 (1989) (ICWA enacted to address removal of Indian children and protects tribal interests)
  • B.H. v. People in Interest of X.H., 138 P.3d 299 (Colo. 2006) (tribes have distinct, equivalent interests and must be given meaningful opportunity to participate)
  • People in Interest of N.D.C., 210 P.3d 494 (Colo. App. 2009) (agency must notify identified tribes when there is reason to know child may be Indian child)
  • People in Interest of T.M.W., 208 P.3d 272 (Colo. App. 2009) (ICWA notice sufficiency reviewed de novo)
  • United States v. Wheeler, 435 U.S. 313 (1978) (discussion of Navajo self-designation as Diné)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Concerning L.H
Court Name: Colorado Court of Appeals
Date Published: Feb 22, 2018
Citations: 2018 COA 27; 431 P.3d 663; 17CA0608
Docket Number: 17CA0608
Court Abbreviation: Colo. Ct. App.
Log In
    People v. Concerning L.H, 2018 COA 27