midpage
Sign in to see your projects.
476 B.R. 254
Bankr. C.D. Cal.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Adversary proceeding in bankruptcy court to determine dischargeability of debt under 11 U.S.C. §§ 523(a)(4) and (a)(6) and to object to discharge under § 727.
  • Harold Pemstein filed the complaint; Martin Pemstein and Diana Pemstein are defendants; proceedings include trial on Nov 30, 2011 and Apr 10, 2012.
  • Martin and Diana filed a Chapter 11 petition for HMS Properties; Harold and Martin were brothers and business partners prior to bankruptcy.
  • Harold obtained a California Superior Court judgment against Martin on Jan 5, 2010 for $696,218.03 related to breach of duty in rent collection.
  • Joint Pretrial Order stipulates the parties were 50% owners of HMS Properties and the 2010 judgment is final with res judicata effect.
  • The court ultimately grants judgment to Martin and Diana, denying all of Harold’s claims for nondischargeability and dischargeability.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
§523(a)(4) defalcation f iduciary Pemstein Pemstein Denied; no proven defalcation
§523(a)(6) willful/malicious injury Pemstein Pemstein Denied; no willful/malicious injury proven
§727(a)(2)(A) concealment of assets Pemstein Pemstein Denied; no concealment proven
§727(a)(3) failure to keep records Pemstein Pemstein Denied; records inadequacy not shown

Key Cases Cited

  • In re Stanifer, 236 B.R. 709 (9th Cir.BAP 1999) (defalcation standard and fiduciary capacity analysis)
  • In re Lewis, 97 F.3d 1182 (9th Cir.1996) (defalcation defined as misappropriation or failure to account)
  • In re Niles, 106 F.3d 1456 (9th Cir.1997) (limits defalcation to funds entrusted and not accounted for)
  • In re Hemmeter, 242 F.3d 1186 (9th Cir.2001) (defalcation may occur without fraudulent intent)
  • Landis v. Scott, 32 Pa. (8 Casey) 495 (Pa. 1859) (fiduciary’s accountability for rents; limited applicability)
  • Hughes v. Lawson, 122 F.3d 1237 (9th Cir.1997) (elements of § 727(a)(2)(A) require disposition and intent within one year)
  • Petralia v. Jercich, 238 F.3d 1202 (9th Cir.2001) (willful injury standard; substantial certainty and purpose to injure)
  • In re Cox, 41 F.3d 1294 (9th Cir.1994) (predecessor standard for prima facie case under § 727(a)(3))
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Pemstein v. Pemstein (In re Pemstein)
Court Name: United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California
Date Published: Jul 26, 2012
Citations: 476 B.R. 254; Bankruptcy No. 2:12-bk-15900-RK; Adversary No. 2:12-ap-01291-RK
Docket Number: Bankruptcy No. 2:12-bk-15900-RK; Adversary No. 2:12-ap-01291-RK
Court Abbreviation: Bankr. C.D. Cal.
Log In