History
  • No items yet
midpage
2013 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 13
T.C.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • IRS issued notices of deficiency for 2006 and 2007 to the Flecks and Peeks after they used IRAs to invest in FP Company and executed guarantees securing FP Company debt.
  • IACC plan promoted prohibited 4975 transactions; Fleck and Peek established self-directed IRAs and funded FP with IRA assets.
  • Personal guaranties on FP Company debt were recorded as deeds of trust on petitioners’ residences and continued through 2006.
  • IRS contends the guaranties caused prohibited transactions, causing IRAs to cease to qualify as IRAs for tax purposes.
  • Tax consequences: gains on FP stock in 2006 and 2007 taxed to petitioners; penalties imposed for accuracy-related understatements.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether guaranties were prohibited transactions under 4975(c)(1)(B). IRS: indirect lending to IRAs via guaranties prohibited. Fleck/Peek: guaranties were not to the plan itself. Yes; guaranties were prohibited transactions.
Tax consequences of prohibited transactions on IRA status and sale of FP stock. IRAs ceased to qualify in 2001, causing tax on gains from sale. IRAs remained exempt; gains not taxable. IRAs ceased in 2001; gains taxed to petitioners in 2006/2007.
Whether accuracy-related penalties apply for substantial understatements. Understatements for 2006/2007 due to prohibited transactions; penalties warranted. Reasonable cause and reliance on professionals negates penalties. Penalties sustained for both years.

Key Cases Cited

  • Janpol v. Commissioner, 101 T.C. 518 (1993) (indirect loan guaranties extend credit to the plan’s disqualified person)
  • Commissioner v. Keystone Consol. Indus., Inc., 508 U.S. 152 (1993) (broad language of indirect extensions of credit contemplated by 4975(c)(1))
  • 106 Ltd. v. Commissioner, 136 T.C. 67 (2011) (promoter status affects reasonable reliance and reasonable cause)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Peek v. Comm'r
Court Name: United States Tax Court
Date Published: May 9, 2013
Citations: 2013 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 13; 140 T.C. No. 12; 140 T.C. 216; 140 T.C. 12; Docket Nos. 5951-11, 6481-11.
Docket Number: Docket Nos. 5951-11, 6481-11.
Court Abbreviation: T.C.
Log In
    Peek v. Comm'r, 2013 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 13