midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
3:24-ap-03004
Bankr. S.D.W. Va.
Mar 26, 2025
Read the full case

Background

  • Brianne Larisse Hurd and Rodney Brian Hurd (“the Hurds”) filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy protection on April 12, 2024.
  • Prior to the bankruptcy, on July 6, 2023, the Hurds had borrowed $6,000 from Terry Pearsall to repay debts and avoid eviction.
  • After borrowing, the Hurds allegedly refused repayment and a default judgment was entered against them in state court for $6,000 plus costs and interest.
  • Pearsall commenced an adversary proceeding seeking a ruling that this judgment debt should be excepted from discharge under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(B) due to alleged fraud.
  • The court addressed several procedural motions from both parties, including motions to strike, to quash, and for summary judgment, and considered whether Pearsall’s complaint stated a claim for nondischargeability.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Nondischargeability under § 523(a)(2)(B) The judgment is nondischargeable due to a false written statement about financial condition. No such statement or fraud; complaint insufficient. Dismissed: Complaint fails to allege required facts/elements of § 523(a)(2)(B) fraud.
Sufficiency of the Complaint Complaint alleges facts sufficient for relief Insufficient factual allegations and no fraud Complaint does not meet Rule 8/9(b) standards—dismissed for failure to state a claim.
Timing and Use of Written Statement Later texts refusing payment show fraud Statements made after loan are irrelevant Post-loan statements cannot support claim; no pre-loan written misrepresentation pled.
Pending Procedural Motions Motions should be addressed on merits Motions are moot if complaint dismissed All pending motions denied as moot following dismissal of complaint.

Key Cases Cited

  • Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (pleading standards for plausibility)
  • Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (plausibility requirement for complaints)
  • Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89 (all factual allegations must be taken as true at 12(b)(6) stage)
  • McCleary–Evans v. Md. Dep't of Transp., State Highway Admin., 780 F.3d 582 (Rule 8 pleading standard)
  • Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41 (standard for stating a claim)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Pearsall v. Hurd
Court Name: United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. West Virginia
Date Published: Mar 26, 2025
Citation: 3:24-ap-03004
Docket Number: 3:24-ap-03004
Court Abbreviation: Bankr. S.D.W. Va.
Log In