25 F.4th 391
6th Cir.2022Background
- On June 29, 2016, Jessie Mills took his two-year-old daughter from her grandparents and walked down the middle of a dark road; deputies Mikey Ashurst and Brandon Bolton pursued to recover the child.
- Officers ordered Mills to stop; a fall occurred (disputedly caused by a flashlight blow or a taser cartridge), and the child was recovered.
- A prolonged, violent physical encounter followed: officers tased and struck Mills repeatedly; witnesses and officers disagree whether Mills actively resisted.
- Ashurst then shot and killed Mills; witnesses conflict about whether Mills charged at Ashurst or took only a step or two while largely nonthreatening.
- Mills’s mother (Gambrel) sued under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (excessive force) and state law; district court granted summary judgment to the officers and Knox County and dismissed state-law claims without prejudice.
- Sixth Circuit: affirmed qualified immunity for the officers’ initial force to recover the child and affirmed summary judgment for Knox County on Monell failure-to-train; reversed as to the five-minute beating and the shooting (material factual disputes remain) and remanded; also reversed dismissal of state-law claims.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Initial use of force to recover child (taser/flashlight blow) | Force was excessive and unconstitutional | Officers had probable cause to believe a serious felony (kidnapping) and could use force to recover child | Officers entitled to qualified immunity for initial force — a reasonable officer could have believed it lawful |
| 2. Five-minute struggle (repeated strikes, taser use) | Evidence (Hobbs) shows gratuitous beating of nonresisting Mills; unconstitutional | Officers say Mills violently resisted, justifying force | Genuine dispute of material fact (Hobbs’s account must be credited at summary judgment); cannot grant qualified immunity — trial required |
| 3. Fatal shooting by Ashurst | Under Hobbs’s version, Mills was nondangerous/unarmed and only stepped toward Ashurst; shooting unlawful | Officers and other witnesses say Mills charged aggressively after threatening to "hurt" them; deadly force reasonable | Shooting cannot be resolved on summary judgment because of disputed facts; qualified immunity denied at this stage for Ashurst |
| 4. Knox County Monell claim (failure to train/supervise Ashurst) | County failed to train/supervise, allowing excessive-force misconduct | County relied on academy training; no pattern of similar violations and single-incident theory fails where misconduct is obviously unlawful | County entitled to summary judgment: no deliberate indifference or causation shown for single-incident municipal liability |
Key Cases Cited
- Scott v. Harris, 550 U.S. 372 (2007) (objective video can blatantly contradict plaintiff’s account so no reasonable jury could believe it)
- Tolan v. Cotton, 572 U.S. 650 (2014) (on summary judgment courts must view facts in light most favorable to nonmoving party)
- Graham v. Connor, 490 U.S. 386 (1989) (excessive-force test: balance government interests, suspect’s interests; consider severity of crime, threat posed, and resistance)
- Tennessee v. Garner, 471 U.S. 1 (1985) (deadly force permissible only if officer has probable cause to believe subject poses serious physical harm)
- Rivas-Villegas v. Cortesluna, 142 S. Ct. 4 (2021) (plaintiff must identify closely analogous precedent to overcome qualified immunity except in obvious cases)
- Pearson v. Callahan, 555 U.S. 223 (2009) (qualified-immunity two-step; courts may address either prong first)
- Shreve v. Jessamine Cnty. Fiscal Ct., 453 F.3d 681 (6th Cir. 2006) (gratuitous post-neutralization beating violates clearly established rights; plaintiff’s version credited at summary judgment)
- Sova v. City of Mt. Pleasant, 142 F.3d 898 (6th Cir. 1998) (deadly force unlawful under plaintiff’s version where an unarmed, nonthreatening subject was shot)
- Monell v. Dep’t of Soc. Servs., 436 U.S. 658 (1978) (municipal liability requires a municipal policy or custom causing constitutional violation)
- Bd. of Cnty. Comm’rs v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397 (1997) (municipal deliberate indifference standard and need for pattern except in narrow circumstances)
