History
  • No items yet
midpage
762 F.3d 611
7th Cir.
2014
Read the full case

Background

  • An inspector cited Black Beauty Coal Company under 30 C.F.R. § 77.1605(k) for lacking a berm along the outer bank of an elevated roadway (the bench) during a dragline move at Somerville Central Mine in Indiana.
  • The bench serves as a road for mine vehicles; berms are dirt mounds intended to prevent vehicles from falling 50 feet to the pit below.
  • During the dragline move, the berm was reduced from at least 5 feet to about 3 feet; a bulldozer and service trucks assisted the move and sometimes used the bench.
  • An inspector later observed a segment with no berm for about two-tenths of a mile, and service trucks were within 18 feet of the edge.
  • The ALJ, then the Commission on remand, found a berm was lacking and that the violation was significant and unwarrantable; the Commission ultimately denied Black Beauty’s petition for review.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the bench was a roadway during the dragline move Black Beauty: bench ceased to be roadway while dragline moved. Secretary: bench remained a roadway because service/haulage vehicles used it during the move. Bench remained a roadway during the move; substantial evidence supports roadway status.
Whether a remnant berm sufficed to meet § 77.1605(k) Remnant berm 16–17 inches met the height requirement. No berm or insufficient berm existed for two-tenths of a mile. Insufficient remnant berm; substantial evidence supports violation.
Whether the lack of a berm was a significant and substantial violation Lack of berm posed a possible path to serious injury; hazard was reasonably likely. Risk under evidence was not reasonably likely to occur or cause serious injury. Violation is significant and substantial.
Whether the violation was unwarrantable (more than ordinary negligence) Given prior berm citations and notice, the failure to cure was unwarrantable. Past notices do not necessarily show unwarrantable conduct in the present case. Violation was unwarrantable; Black Beauty on notice and failed to comply.

Key Cases Cited

  • Capitol Aggregates, Inc. v. Secretary of Labor, 4 FMSHRC 846 (1982) (roadway/bench as elevated roadway for machinery)
  • El Paso Rock Quarries, Inc., 3 FMSHRC 35 (1981) (bench with haulage trucks as roadway)
  • Buck Creek Coal Co., 52 F.3d 133 (7th Cir. 1995) (substantial evidence standard for witness testimony)
  • Consolidation Coal Co., 22 FMSHRC 340 (2000) (unwarrantable violation factors (notice, extent, duration))
  • New Warwick Mining Co., 18 FMSHRC 1568 (1996) (notice and reasonableness in unwarrantable determinations)
  • IO Coal Company, Inc., 31 FMSHRC 1346 (2009) (factors for unwarrantable violations and notice)
  • Mach Mining, LLC v. Secretary of Labor, 728 F.3d 643 (7th Cir. 2013) (standard for substantial evidence and agency findings)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Peabody Midwest Mining, LLC v. Federal Mine Safety & Health Review Commission
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Date Published: Aug 12, 2014
Citations: 762 F.3d 611; 2014 WL 3906498; 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 15467; 13-1659
Docket Number: 13-1659
Court Abbreviation: 7th Cir.
Log In