History
  • No items yet
midpage
(PC) Taylor v. Schultz
2:25-cv-00199
| E.D. Cal. | Jun 30, 2025
Read the full case

Background

  • Dionn Taylor, a state prisoner, filed a pro se civil rights complaint, seeking to proceed in forma pauperis.
  • Taylor alleges that on November 15, 2024, Correctional Officer (C/O) Ellis staged an attack against him by providing false information to other inmates and then used excessive force (mace and twisting Taylor's arm).
  • Other named defendants (Rodriguez, Warden Schultz, Sergeant Judd) were implicated by Taylor but not alleged to have directly participated in the excessive force.
  • The court screened the complaint as required for prisoner filings to determine if it stated any viable claims.
  • The court found a potential Eighth Amendment excessive force claim stated only against Ellis; all other claims/defendants were insufficiently pled.
  • Plaintiff is given the option to proceed solely on the claim against Ellis or file an amended complaint.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
In forma pauperis status Taylor qualifies for in forma pauperis N/A Granted
Excessive force under 8th Amendment Ellis used mace and twisted his arm N/A Sufficiently pled against Ellis for screening
Liability of other officers Other officers were involved N/A Not sufficiently alleged; dismissed
Opportunity to amend Wishes to maintain or expand claims N/A May amend complaint or proceed on Ellis claim only

Key Cases Cited

  • Hudson v. McMillian, 503 U.S. 1 (U.S. 1992) (discusses standards for excessive force claims under the Eighth Amendment)
  • Monell v. Department of Social Services, 436 U.S. 658 (U.S. 1978) (requires a direct causal link between defendant’s actions and alleged constitutional violation)
  • Rizzo v. Goode, 423 U.S. 362 (U.S. 1976) (supervisory liability requires personal involvement, not just supervisory status)
  • Simmons v. Navajo County, 609 F.3d 1011 (9th Cir. 2010) (addresses requirement for personal participation in § 1983 claims)
  • Ewing v. City of Stockton, 588 F.3d 1218 (9th Cir. 2009) (personal involvement required for liability under § 1983)
  • Rodriguez v. County of Los Angeles, 891 F.3d 776 (9th Cir. 2018) (supervisory officials not liable solely due to position)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: (PC) Taylor v. Schultz
Court Name: District Court, E.D. California
Date Published: Jun 30, 2025
Docket Number: 2:25-cv-00199
Court Abbreviation: E.D. Cal.