History
  • No items yet
midpage
935 F.3d 521
6th Cir.
2019
Read the full case

Background

  • In 2014 Osborne (a Medicare beneficiary) fractured his arm at a Metro Nashville facility and later obtained a Tennessee state-court judgment against Metro Nashville for medical expenses and other damages; the judgment survived appeal.
  • Before the state judgment, Medicare made conditional payments for Osborne’s medical care totaling at least $9,453.09 because Metro Nashville did not pay those bills at the time.
  • Osborne alleges Metro Nashville has not reimbursed Medicare for those conditional payments and has not satisfied the state-court judgment, forcing him to pay copays/deductibles and incur litigation costs.
  • Osborne sued in federal court under the Medicare Secondary Payer Act (MSPA), 42 U.S.C. § 1395y(b), seeking reimbursement and double damages under § 1395y(b)(3)(A).
  • The district court dismissed, holding Osborne lacked a private cause of action under the MSPA against a tortfeasor and also lacked Article III standing to pursue Medicare’s conditional-payment claim; the Sixth Circuit affirmed.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether MSPA provides a private right for a Medicare beneficiary to sue a tortfeasor for reimbursement/double damages Osborne: MSPA’s private cause of action covers "primary plans," which include tortfeasors after the 2003 amendments, so he can sue for double damages Metro Nashville: MSPA (esp. the 2003 amendments and the "demonstrated responsibility" provision) was intended to let Medicare, not private parties, sue tortfeasors; private suits would make MSPA a super-judgment enforcement tool Court: MSPA does not permit a private cause of action by a Medicare beneficiary against a tortfeasor; affirmed dismissal
Whether Osborne has Article III standing to pursue Medicare’s conditional-payment reimbursement Osborne: Medicare’s financial injury is attributable to him and he suffered out-of-pocket copays and costs Metro Nashville: Medicare’s injury is separate; Osborne cannot assert Medicare’s claim; his alleged individual injuries are conclusory or redressed by state judgment Court: Osborne lacks standing to sue for Medicare’s conditional payments and his asserted individual harms were insufficiently pleaded
Whether the 2003 MSPA amendments (including "demonstrated responsibility") change the private cause of action scope Osborne: Amendments expanded "primary plan" to include tortfeasors, enabling private suits Metro Nashville: Amendments intended to enable Medicare recovery against tortfeasors, not private litigants Court: Sixth Circuit precedent (Bio-Medical) persuasively interprets amendments as permitting Medicare-only suits against tortfeasors
Whether use of MSPA here would improperly convert it into a super-judgment enforcement mechanism Osborne: MSPA double-damages remedy is available regardless Metro Nashville: Allowing a second federal MSPA suit after a state judgment would convert MSPA into a super-judgment device Court: Agrees that permitting Osborne’s suit would risk transforming MSPA into a super-judgment enforcement mechanism; supports denial

Key Cases Cited

  • Bio-Medical Applications of Tenn., Inc. v. Cent. States Se. & Sw. Areas Health & Welfare Fund, 656 F.3d 277 (6th Cir. 2011) (extensive analysis concluding 2003 MSPA amendments allow Medicare, not private parties, to sue tortfeasors)
  • Keys v. Humana, Inc., 684 F.3d 605 (6th Cir. 2012) (standard of review for Rule 12(b)(6) dismissal)
  • Crugher v. Prelesnik, 761 F.3d 610 (6th Cir. 2014) (pleading standard and construing complaints in plaintiff’s favor)
  • Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (2007) (plausibility pleading standard)
  • Lewis v. Cont'l Bank Corp., 494 U.S. 472 (1990) (attorney’s fees alone do not create Article III case or controversy)
  • Mich. Spine & Brain Surgeons, PLLC v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 758 F.3d 787 (6th Cir. 2014) (distinguishing aspects of MSPA private cause of action applicability)
  • Glover v. Liggett Grp., Inc., 459 F.3d 1304 (11th Cir. 2006) (interpretation of MSPA expansion to include entities carrying their own risk)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Osborne v. Metro. Gov't of Nashville & Davidson Cnty.
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Date Published: Aug 20, 2019
Citations: 935 F.3d 521; 18-6062
Docket Number: 18-6062
Court Abbreviation: 6th Cir.
Log In
    Osborne v. Metro. Gov't of Nashville & Davidson Cnty., 935 F.3d 521