History
  • No items yet
midpage
Onumah v. State
313 Ga. App. 269
| Ga. Ct. App. | 2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Onumah was convicted by a jury of six armed robbery, six aggravated assault, six kidnapping, six false imprisonment, one obstruction of an officer, and one marijuana possession count.
  • The trial court merged the aggravated assault convictions with armed robbery and sentenced Onumah to life with parole on each armed robbery count, plus other concurrent terms.
  • Onumah timely appealed following denial of a amended motion for new trial.
  • Appellant challenges life sentencing under OCGA § 17-10-7(a); this issue has been decided adversely to him.
  • Appellant argues kidnapping convictions are unsupported by asportation evidence and that his identity as a participant is insufficient.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether life sentences for armed robbery under OCGA § 17-10-7(a) were proper Onumah argues sentencing error under § 17-10-7(a). Onumah relies on his own interpretation of the statute. Courts have already rejected this argument; sentencing upheld.
Whether asportation evidence suffices for kidnapping conviction Asportation was insufficient per Garza factors. Movement enhanced control and endangered victims; Garza standards satisfied. Evidence was sufficient to support kidnapping convictions.
Whether there is sufficient circumstantial evidence to convict as an initiator Circumstantial identity evidence may support guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The circumstantial evidence fails to prove Onumah was a perpetrator. Evidence was sufficient under Jackson v. Virginia; no reversal.

Key Cases Cited

  • Garza v. State, 284 Ga. 696 (2008) (four-factor Garza test for asportation in kidnapping)
  • Henderson v. State, 285 Ga. 240 (2009) (asportation may satisfy Garza even when movement is minor)
  • Tate v. State, 287 Ga. 364 (2010) (movement may create additional danger and not be inherent to the offense)
  • Williams v. State, 304 Ga. App. 787 (2010) (movement of victims into same area can negate isolation claim)
  • Mays v. State, 198 Ga. App. 402 (1991) (circumstantial evidence can support guilt beyond reasonable doubt)
  • Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (1979) (standard for sufficiency of evidence in criminal cases)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Onumah v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Nov 15, 2011
Citation: 313 Ga. App. 269
Docket Number: A11A0807
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.