History
  • No items yet
midpage
316 Conn. 202
Conn.
2015
Read the full case

Background

  • Town contracted with Old Colony (Low bid $912,500) to replace a pump station; contract effective April 22, 2004, with substantial completion due January 17, 2005; liquidated damages of $400/day provided.
  • Contract contained procedures for time extensions and price adjustments: written notice to project engineer within 30 days of event and supporting data within 60 days; change orders could adjust time/price if mutually agreed.
  • Project experienced numerous delays (contractor late submittals, unforeseen utility locations, removal of caisson); the town extended completion to June 14, 2005 but warned liquidated damages would apply thereafter.
  • Town ultimately terminated the contract for convenience on August 14, 2007; Old Colony sought payment under the termination-for-convenience provision and later claimed equitable adjustment for delay-related costs.
  • Trial court awarded Old Colony $164,440.64 under termination-for-convenience, found Old Colony had not complied with contractual notice requirements for time/cost adjustments, awarded town $315,000 in liquidated damages, and set off amounts to render a net judgment for the town. Judgment affirmed on appeal.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether termination for convenience bars owner from recovering default-based remedies (liquidated damages) Termination-for-convenience precludes default remedies; allowing both would nullify distinction between convenience and for-cause termination Contract preserves "any other right or remedy" in the termination-for-convenience clause, so town may still recover liquidated damages Court: Contract language is clear; town may recover liquidated damages despite terminating for convenience
Whether liquidated damages clause is unenforceable where delays were partially caused by town (Alden rule) Alden requires abrogation of liquidated damages when both parties contribute to delay Contract provides mechanisms (change orders/time-extension procedures) to adjust the liquidated-damages date; Old Colony failed to follow those procedures Court: Alden inapplicable because contract preserved a Mosler Safe exception; liquidated damages enforceable absent contractor compliance with extension procedures
Whether town must prove actual damages to recover liquidated damages Plaintiff: must show actual loss; liquidated sum cannot be enforced if owner suffered no damage Defendant: liquidated damages recoverable because contract validly set a reasonable pre-estimate of loss and no finding shows zero damages Court: No proof-of-actual-damage requirement here; liquidated damages recoverable under contract absent factual finding of no damage
Whether change orders waived strict notice requirements or modified contract to allow equitable adjustment Old Colony: change orders acknowledging schedule impact modified the contract and excused strict notice compliance Town: change orders did not quantify time extensions nor comply with formal notice/claim procedures; no mutual assent to modify notice regime Court: Trial court not clearly erroneous in finding no contract modification or waiver; Old Colony’s equitable-adjustment claim fails for lack of strict contractual compliance

Key Cases Cited

  • Hartford Electric Applicators of Thermalux, Inc. v. Alden, 169 Conn. 177 (discusses abrogation of liquidated-damages clause when delays attributable to both parties)
  • Mosler Safe Co. v. Maiden Lane Safe Deposit Co., 199 N.Y. 479 (parties may preserve liquidated damages by contractually empowering an architect/engineer to extend completion date)
  • Norwalk Door Closer Co. v. Eagle Lock & Screw Co., 153 Conn. 681 (liquidated damages not enforced where it is apparent plaintiff suffered no damage)
  • Litton Industries Credit Corp. v. Catanuto, 175 Conn. 69 (interpretation of contractual limitation of remedies and alternative remedies language)
  • Armour & Co. v. Nard, 463 F.2d 8 (federal case giving effect to reservation of rights after termination for convenience)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Old Colony Construction, LLC v. Southington
Court Name: Supreme Court of Connecticut
Date Published: Apr 21, 2015
Citations: 316 Conn. 202; 113 A.3d 406; SC19346
Docket Number: SC19346
Court Abbreviation: Conn.
Log In
    Old Colony Construction, LLC v. Southington, 316 Conn. 202