O'Shaughnessy v. People
269 P.3d 1233
Colo.2012Background
- Defendant Michael O’Shaughnessy attacked Geri David in a grocery-store parking lot, stabbing her multiple times with a hunting knife and demanding money.
- David testified to being stabbed six times, wounded on neck, throat, thigh, and hand, while she fought back during the attempted robbery.
- O’Shaughnessy was convicted of attempted first degree murder with a deadly weapon, attempted aggravated robbery, second degree assault, false imprisonment, reckless endangerment, and a violent crime sentence enhancer.
- The trial court denied O’Shaughnessy’s request for a jury instruction on the affirmative defense of abandonment.
- The court of appeals held there was an unauthorized restriction on abandonment by denying the instruction when the defendant had sustained injuries to the victim.
- The Colorado Supreme Court held that to obtain a jury instruction on abandonment, a defendant must present some credible evidence; injury to the victim does not automatically foreclose abandonment, but in this case the evidence was insufficient for an instruction.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether abandonment requires credible evidence for jury consideration | O’Shaughnessy argues abandonment should be available when evidence supports renunciation | State maintains abandonment requires credible evidence to raise the defense | Yes; some credible evidence required for jury instruction |
| Whether injury defeats abandonment in attempted murder/robbery | Injury could be consistent with abandonment in some circumstances | Injury does not automatically negate abandonment, but facts here show no credible abandonment | Injury alone did not establish abandonment here; no credible evidence supported abandonment for instruction |
Key Cases Cited
- People v. Johnson, 41 Colo.App. 220, 585 P.2d 306 (Colo. 1978) (evidence can raise abandonment when credible)
- Traubert v. People, 625 P.2d 991 (Colo. 1981) (abandonment not available after completion of attempt)
- Scialabba v. People, 55 P.3d 207 (Colo. App. 2002) (abandonment in tampering case not available after attempt)
- Nicholas v. People, 950 P.2d 634 (Colo. App. 1997) (abandonment defense evaluated on evidence)
- Nicholas v. People, 978 P.2d 1218 (Colo. 1999) (reaffirmed evaluation of abandonment evidence)
- Hill v. People, 934 P.2d 821 (Colo. 1997) (some credible evidence standard governs abandonment instruction)
- Lybarger v. People, 807 P.2d 570 (Colo. 1991) (affirmative defenses require credible evidence to submit to jury)
- Saavedra-Rodriguez v. People, 971 P.2d 223 (Colo. 1998) (scintilla/credible-evidence standard for defenses)
- Gandiaga v. People, 70 P.3d 523 (Colo. App. 2002) (abandonment defense evaluated in attempted offenses)
