History
  • No items yet
midpage
2014 Ohio 825
Ohio Ct. App.
2014
Read the full case

Background

  • Northern Haserot sought payment of a $9,249.83 account balance from Moton for goods delivered to Moton's company, The King of Bar-B-Que Ribs Company, Inc.
  • The agreement included a forum-selection clause naming Cuyahoga County and a personal guaranty signed by Moton.
  • Moton petitioned for change of venue arguing Richland County was the proper venue and contested personal liability, asserting he acted only in a corporate capacity.
  • The trial court denied Moton’s motion; Northern Haserot moved for summary judgment and Moton did not oppose.
  • The trial court granted summary judgment against Moton for the balance due, with 18% annual interest from September 28, 2012.
  • Moton appealed, raising multiple assignments of error challenging the summary judgment, venue, and personal liability.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether summary judgment was proper Northern Haserot showed a valid balance, the signed agreement, invoices, and Waters affidavit. Moton challenged sufficiency of proof and factual disputes. Summary judgment proper; evidence established entitlement as a matter of law.
Whether the case management conference denial affected outcome No prejudice; burden shifted to Moton after motion for summary judgment. Court should have rescheduled or allowed telephone participation. No reversible error; failure to reschedule did not prejudice Moton.
Whether Moton is personally liable despite signing as President Guaranty language in the agreement makes Moton personally liable regardless of title. Signature as President should limit liability to the corporation. Moton personally liable; guaranty language controlling.
Whether venue and jurisdiction were proper given a forum-selection clause Moton expressly consented to venue in Cuyahoga County under the agreement. Richland County is proper; forum-selection clause invalid for him. Venue and jurisdiction were proper; denial of change of venue affirmed.

Key Cases Cited

  • Original Pizza Pan v. CWC Sports Group, Inc., 194 Ohio App.3d 50 (2011-Ohio-1684) (forum-selection clause and personal jurisdiction considerations)
  • Pensco Trust Co. v. H&J Props., L.L.C., 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 93826 (2010-Ohio-3610) (determining capacity of signer from instrument as a whole)
  • Dresher v. Burt, 75 Ohio St.3d 280 (1996) (Dresher burden-shifting framework for summary judgment)
  • State ex rel. Duganitz v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth., 77 Ohio St.3d 190 (1996) (summary-judgment standard and related review)
  • Baiko v. Mays, 140 Ohio App.3d 1 (2000) (appellate briefing and de novo review standards)
  • N.E. Ohio Apt. Assn. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Commrs., 121 Ohio App.3d 188 (1997) (summary judgment standard and evidentiary burden)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: N. Frozen Foods, Inc. v. Moton
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Mar 6, 2014
Citations: 2014 Ohio 825; 99938
Docket Number: 99938
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.
Log In