History
  • No items yet
midpage
Murphy v. Ticor Title Insurance
316 Ga. App. 97
| Ga. Ct. App. | 2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Murphy and his father purchased 85 acres in Franklin County in 1987; deed included a right-of-way and easement for ingress/egress over a road called Lakeview Lane.
  • The Murphys’ property abutted Lake Side Acres, with Lakeview Lane providing access; an unpaved dirt road extended across Murphy’s land.
  • Ticor Title Insurance issued a title policy for the property, with premiums paid by Murphy; Schedule A described the land and included the easement.
  • Policy language included exclusions and provisions stating lack of right of access and unmarketability were insured and that defects attaching after the date of policy were excluded.
  • In 2007 and again in 2009, a neighbor blocked Murphy’s access on Lakeview Lane; Murphy notified Ticor and made a claim for diminution in value; Ticor denied the claim as post-date-of-policy events.
  • Trial court granted dismissal for failure to state a claim and later considered affidavits, converting the motion to summary judgment; on appeal, the court reviewed de novo and affirmed, holding the policy unambiguous and excluding coverage for post-policy events.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the policy language is ambiguous and requires construction in Murphy’s favor Murphy argues ambiguities exist and should be construed in his favor Ticor contends the policy language is clear and unambiguous Ambiguity not found; contract construed as a whole in favor of insured when ambiguous; here, not ambiguous
Whether post-policy events that diminish value are covered Murphy seeks coverage for post-1987 events affecting access Events occurred after the policy date and are excluded by exclusions Policy excludes post-date-of-policy events; no coverage for later obstruction of access

Key Cases Cited

  • Reed v. Auto-Owners Ins. Co., 284 Ga. 286, 287 (2) (667 SE2d 90) (2008) (Ga. 2008) (title claims and contract construction principles cited)
  • Fidelity Nat. Title Ins. Co. v. Matrix Financial Sues. Corp., 255 Ga. App. 874, 878 (1) (567 SE2d 96) (2002) (Ga. App. 2002) (supports definitions and scope of title insurance)
  • Fidelity Nat. Title Ins. Co. v. Keyingham Investments, LLC, 288 Ga. 312, 313 (1) (702 SE2d 851) (2010) (Ga. 2010) (policy construction and exclusions interpretation)
  • Harkins v. Progressive Gulf Ins. Co., 262 Ga. App. 559, 560 (586 SE2d 1) (2003) (Ga. App. 2003) (court cites standard for policy ambiguities and construction)
  • Green v. Sams, 209 Ga. App. 491, 497 (1) (433 SE2d 678) (1993) (Ga. App. 1993) (contract interpretation guidance and insurance policy construction)
  • White v. Lawyers Title-Ins. Corp., 197 Ga. App. 780, 783 (4) (399 SE2d 526) (1990) (Ga. App. 1990) (insurer’s title insurance scope and related rights)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Murphy v. Ticor Title Insurance
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: May 11, 2012
Citation: 316 Ga. App. 97
Docket Number: A12A0219
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.