History
  • No items yet
midpage
222 N.C. App. 75
N.C. Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Defendant and plaintiff, formerly married, resolved their equitable distribution via a May 2010 consent order.
  • Under the consent order, the Denali was to be transferred to plaintiff and the Mercedes to defendant, with the Mercedes currently titled only in plaintiff’s name.
  • The parties were to remove each other’s name from the vehicle titles within one year and bear their own vehicle costs.
  • Defendant did not refinance the Mercedes in her name, leaving plaintiff liable for the Mercedes debt.
  • On August 23, 2010, Coastal Federal Credit Union informed that the Mercedes was repossessed and sold, leaving a deficiency of $12,284.89 charged to plaintiff.
  • Plaintiff filed a verified motion for civil contempt on February 7, 2011, seeking fees and costs for pursuing the contempt and asking the court to sanction defendant.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Burden of proof in contempt show cause Plaintiff contends burden shifts when a motion initiates contempt Defendant argues burden on her due to assistant clerk’s show cause order Defendant waived due to no objection; burden on plaintiff not required
Willfulness of noncompliance with the consent order Plaintiff argues defendant had the means and willfully failed to pay Defendant asserts no knowledge or intent to owe the deficiency Court found willfulness based on evidence defendant knew of deficiency and could pay
Procedural defect waiver Plaintiff asserts no waiver issue if not objected Defendant failed to raise procedural defect Waived defect by defendant’s appearance and participation in the contempt hearing

Key Cases Cited

  • Lowder v. Mills, Inc., 301 N.C. 561 (N.C. 1981) (waiver rules in show cause contempt proceedings)
  • Bethea v. McDonald, 70 N.C. App. 566 (N.C. App. 1984) (appearance in court suffices to support jurisdiction over contempt)
  • Trivette v. Trivette, 162 N.C. App. 55 (N.C. App. 2004) (burden of proof issues when aggrieved party initiates contempt)
  • Cannon v. Miller, 313 N.C. 324 (N.C. 1985) (binding authority on appellate adherence to Supreme Court decisions)
  • Watson v. Watson, 187 N.C. App. 55 (N.C. App. 2007) (finding of fact conclusive if supported by competent evidence)
  • In the Matter of Appeal from Civil Penalty, 324 N.C. 373 (N.C. 1989) (panel bound by prior decisions of same court)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Moss v. Moss
Court Name: Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Date Published: Aug 7, 2012
Citations: 222 N.C. App. 75; 730 S.E.2d 203; 2012 WL 3171554; 2012 N.C. App. LEXIS 957; No. COA11-1313
Docket Number: No. COA11-1313
Court Abbreviation: N.C. Ct. App.
Log In
    Moss v. Moss, 222 N.C. App. 75