midpage
300 Ga. 521
Ga.
2017
Read the full case

Background

  • On Sept. 15, 2011, Michael Coleman was found with ~20 stab wounds and died; wounds showed he was seated/lying and there was no apparent struggle. No weapon was found on Coleman.
  • Witness Dykes saw a Caucasian man with dark hair, a teardrop tattoo, and a lip ring leaving on a bicycle; Dykes later identified Mosley in a photo lineup.
  • Mosley arrived at a friend’s home that night covered in blood, claimed a bicycle accident, then later told the friend he had killed someone in self-defense after the other person pulled a gun.
  • Police recovered Mosley’s mountain bike with blood on the right brake handle; Mosley had no observable injuries and no weapon was recovered. Victim was smaller and older than Mosley.
  • Mosley was tried June 11–13, 2012, convicted of malice murder and possession of a knife during the commission of a crime, sentenced to life plus five years, and after denied a new trial appealed.

Issues

Issue Mosley’s Argument State’s Argument Held
Sufficiency of the evidence / self‑defense Mosley: evidence shows he acted in lawful self‑defense; no proof of malice or commission of another felony State: physical disparity, lack of Mosley’s injuries, multiple savage wounds, victim unarmed, and forensic evidence support implied malice and aggravated assault Court: affirmed — jury could reject self‑defense; evidence sufficient for malice murder and knife possession convictions
Supplementing missing trial transcript Mosley: reconstructing record from witnesses’ and counsel’s memories denies due process because it relies on memory, not an actual transcript State: OCGA §5‑6‑41(f)/(g) authorizes hearings and supplementation; trial court followed statutory procedure Court: affirmed — trial court complied with statute; its adoption of supplemental testimony is final and not reviewable

Key Cases Cited

  • Glenn v. State, 296 Ga. 509 (affirming deference to jury on credibility and sufficiency review)
  • Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (standard for sufficiency of evidence review)
  • Carr v. State, 267 Ga. 547 (procedures for correcting or completing appellate record under OCGA §5‑6‑41)
  • Glass v. State, 289 Ga. 542 (re‑creation of lost transcript from recollection is permissible under OCGA §5‑6‑41)
  • Leeks v. State, 296 Ga. 515 (trial judge’s adoption of reconstructed transcript is dispositive and not subject to appellate review)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Mosley v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Feb 6, 2017
Citations: 300 Ga. 521; 796 S.E.2d 684; S16A1657
Docket Number: S16A1657
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
Log In