History
  • No items yet
midpage
Morris v. SHINSEKI
2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 9795
Fed. Cir.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Morris served on active duty in 1964; his entry and separation exams were normal for psychiatric illness, but he reported nervous symptoms.
  • 1966 VA claim denied, finding his condition preexisted and was not incurred in service.
  • 1988 Board denied service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder, deeming any symptoms as a personality disorder not eligible for compensation.
  • 1990s evidence led to Board reopening and eventually granting service connection for schizophrenia, with retroactive effects.
  • 1996 Board denied CUE regarding the 1966/1988 decisions; 2004–2008 Board decisions denied CUE; Veterans Court affirmed; this Court affirms the Veterans Court’s ruling.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the 1988 Board decision contained CUE Morris asserts 1988 error by misapplying 3.303(c) and 1111. Shinseki contends no CUE; 3.303(c) excludes personality disorders from compensation. No CUE found; 1988 decision properly applied 3.303(c).
Whether 3.303(c) can defeat 1111 presumption for a personality disorder Presumption of soundness under 1111 should neutralize inservice personality-disorder finding. 1111 presumption does not apply to personality disorders under 3.303(c). Presumption of soundness does not apply to personality disorders; 3.303(c) controls.
Whether 1111 presumption of soundness is relevant when a personality disorder is diagnosed If no pre-service disability noted, 1111 should apply to show preservice origin. Disorder not compensable under 3.303(c); 1111 not triggered. 1111 not applicable to personality disorders; 1988 denial not tainted.
Whether Terry v. Principi governs the outcome here Terry supports requiring 1111 presumption to rebut pre-service condition. Terry supports that personality disorders are not compensable and thus not within 1110/1111 scope. Terry aligned with the outcome; 3.303(c) controls.

Key Cases Cited

  • Terry v. Principi, 340 F.3d 1378 (Fed.Cir. 2003) (regulation 3.303(c) and presumption framework)
  • Winn v. Brown, 8 Vet. App. 510 (Veterans App. 1996) (presumption of soundness not available for personality disorders)
  • Conley v. Peake, 543 F.3d 1301 (Fed.Cir. 2008) (personality disorders are congenital defects not compensable under 3.303(c))
  • Shedden v. Principi, 381 F.3d 1163 (Fed.Cir. 2004) (framework for entitlement under 1110/1111)
  • Forshey v. Principi, 284 F.3d 1335 (en banc 2002) (jurisdiction and standard of review for Veterans Court decisions)
  • Willsey v. Peake, 535 F.3d 1368 (Fed.Cir. 2008) (CUE standard for final VA decisions)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Morris v. SHINSEKI
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Date Published: May 15, 2012
Citation: 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 9795
Docket Number: 2011-7061
Court Abbreviation: Fed. Cir.