History
  • No items yet
midpage
348 P.3d 356
Utah Ct. App.
2015
Read the full case

Background

  • Mitchell was employed by Milliken & Co. and injured her right shoulder at work in 2008 while attempting to throw a rope over a machine roller.
  • She had a prior shoulder condition treated in 2007, which the record shows contributed to her later injury.
  • Mitchell applied for workers’ compensation; the Labor Commission denied benefits, finding the preexisting condition contributed and that the work activity was not an unusual exertion.
  • The Commission relied on medical testimony that a preexisting impingement contributed to the injury and that the injury was an industrial aggravation of the preexisting condition.
  • The court reviews the Commission’s findings de novo for the legal standard, but defers to substantial evidence supporting factual determinations.
  • Key issue concerns whether Mitchell must prove an unusual or extraordinary exertion given her preexisting condition and whether throwing a rope constituted such exertion.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether unusual exertion is required where a preexisting condition contributes Mitchell argues no unusual exertion is required Mitchell must show unusual exertion when a preexisting condition contributes Unusual exertion required; standard upheld
Whether throwing the rope over the machine constitutes unusual exertion The action was unusual given the height and mechanics involved Activity not unusual; comparable to common nonemployment exertions Not established as unusual exertion
Whether the Allen standard should be revisited or maintained Allen is outdated and discriminatory Allen remains controlling precedent Maintain Allen framework; decline to depart

Key Cases Cited

  • Murray v. Labor Comm'n, 2013 UT 38 (Utah Supreme Court, 2013) (unusualness requires objective comparison to nonemployment life)
  • Allen v. Industrial Comm'n, 729 P.2d 15 (Utah Supreme Court, 1986) (unusual exertion standard for preexisting conditions)
  • Estate of Reitz v. Labor Comm'n, 2014 UT App 290 (Utah Court of Appeals, 2014) (substantial evidence standard for Commission findings)
  • O'Rourke v. Utah State Tax Comm'n, 830 P.2d 230 (Utah Supreme Court, 1992) (burden to show error in administrative decision)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Mitchell v. Labor Commission
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Utah
Date Published: Apr 16, 2015
Citations: 348 P.3d 356; 2015 UT App 94; 2015 Utah App. LEXIS 94; 784 Utah Adv. Rep. 29; 2015 WL 1737235; 20131153-CA
Docket Number: 20131153-CA
Court Abbreviation: Utah Ct. App.
Log In
    Mitchell v. Labor Commission, 348 P.3d 356