History
  • No items yet
midpage
312 Ga. App. 290
Ga. Ct. App.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Miranda and Solano sued Stewart in July 2006 for personal injuries from a August 2004 car accident.
  • Stewart served discovery requests; Miranda and Solano did not respond or seek extensions.
  • February 12, 2007, the trial court granted a motion to compel and ordered responses within 10 days; discovery was later extended two months but still unanswered.
  • March 26, 2007, the trial court sanctions-dismissed Miranda and Solano's case for failure to comply with discovery.
  • June 29, 2009, Miranda and Solano moved to set aside the order of dismissal; the court initially granted the motion, then denied it on August 3, 2009.
  • August 6, 2010, appellants renewed their motion, arguing lack of notice; the court denied, citing expiration of the term in which dismissal was entered.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether a 9-11-60(g) motion can be heard after the term. Miranda argues post-term relief is allowed under 9-11-60(g). Stewart contends jurisdiction expired with the term. Motion potentially within 9-11-60(g) authority; remand needed.
Proper procedure when lack of notice affected a judgment. Cambron allows setting aside for lack of notice and re-entry of judgment. No notice issue established; no basis to set aside. Proceedings must consider notice under 9-11-60(g) and Cambron framework.
Effect of term expiration on the court's power to set aside the judgment. Court has inherent discretion to set aside within term if meritorious. Once term ends, only 9-11-60(d) applies; no jurisdiction to hear. Trial court erred; must analyze under 9-11-60(g) and Cambron.

Key Cases Cited

  • First Baptist Church, etc. v. King, 208 Ga. App. 250 (1993) (limited post-term relief; distinction from 9-11-60(g))
  • Piggly Wiggly Southern v. McCook, 216 Ga. App. 335 (1995) (contrast Rule 60 and post-term discretion)
  • Levin Co. v. Walker, 289 Ga. App. 299 (2008) (discusses context of 9-11-60 and proper relief)
  • Cambron v. Canal Ins. Co., 246 Ga. 147 (1980) (notice-based setting aside and re-entry requirement)
  • Vangoosen v. Bohannon, 236 Ga. App. 361 (1999) (notice as prerequisite to setting aside; re-entry)
  • Masters v. Clark, 269 Ga. App. 537 (2004) (motion practice regarding term expiration)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Miranda v. Stewart
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Oct 28, 2011
Citations: 312 Ga. App. 290; 718 S.E.2d 123; 2011 Fulton County D. Rep. 3332; 2011 Ga. App. LEXIS 941; A11A0893
Docket Number: A11A0893
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
Log In
    Miranda v. Stewart, 312 Ga. App. 290