midpage
Sign in to see your projects.
475 F. App'x 671
9th Cir.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • District court dismissed Minority's as-applied First Amendment challenges to §399b and to §73.621(e).
  • Minority appeals, challenging both the statute §399b and the FCC regulation §73.621(e) implementing it.
  • District court granted summary judgment to the government, holding §399b's ban on paid messages promoting for-profit services is not vague.
  • Court of appeals has exclusive jurisdiction to review final FCC orders under 28 U.S.C. § 2342(1); district court lacked jurisdiction.
  • Court held §399b is not unconstitutionally vague and that FCC rulings narrow ambiguity; affirmed dismissal and judgment.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Jurisdiction over FCC orders Minority argues district court may hear as-applied challenges Government relies on exclusive appellate jurisdiction for FCC orders Affirmed: district court lacked jurisdiction over FCC orders; appellate court has exclusive jurisdiction
Vagueness of §399b §399b's term 'promote' could be vague and overbroad Statute is sufficiently definite; misuse addressed by regulations Affirmed: §399b is not unconstitutionally vague
Regulatory narrowing of vagueness Administrative guidance cannot save vagueness Regulations like 47 C.F.R. §1.2 provide narrowing interpretations Affirmed: FCC declaratory rulings narrow interpretations to avoid vagueness

Key Cases Cited

  • Greater New Orleans Broadcasting Ass'n, Inc. v. United States, 527 U.S. 173 (Supreme Court, 1999) (court did not address district court jurisdiction in that context)
  • U.S. v. DuInfer, 219 F.3d 1004 (9th Cir. 2000) (district courts lack jurisdiction over FCC regulations)
  • United States v. L.A. Trucker Truck Lines, Inc., 344 U.S. 33 (Supreme Court, 1952) (reaffirmed separation of jurisdiction in agency matters)
  • Grayned v. City of Rockford, 408 U.S. 104 (Supreme Court, 1972) (vagueness focused on reasonable breadth rather than meticulous specificity)
  • Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, 455 U.S. 489 (Supreme Court, 1982) (administrative regulations can narrow potentially vague interpretations)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Minority Television Project, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Date Published: Apr 12, 2012
Citations: 475 F. App'x 671; 09-17311
Docket Number: 09-17311
Court Abbreviation: 9th Cir.
Log In