History
  • No items yet
midpage
Mike Sumpter v. Secretary of Labor, Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission
763 F.3d 1292
| 11th Cir. | 2014
Read the full case

Background

  • Oak Grove Resources, LLC, a Delaware LLC, runs an underground coal mine; Sumpter and Hartzell were mine supervisory personnel.
  • MSHA cited Oak Grove in December 2009 and January 2010 for ventilation-system violations and failure to conduct required weekly examinations.
  • Order No. 669830 on January 6, 2010 forced evacuation/closure of the affected area.
  • MSHA sought civil penalties under §110(c) against Sumpter and Hartzell personally based on the January 6 Order; ALJ and Commission upheld these liability determinations.
  • Court held that §110(c) can reach agents of LLCs, affirmed the ALJ’s personal-liability decision, and denied duplicative-violation challenges.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether §110(c)’s use of 'corporation' includes LLCs. Sumpter/Hartzell: plain language excludes LLCs. Secretary: 'corporation' is ambiguous and includes LLCs via reasonable interpretation. Ambiguous; LLCs deemed within §110(c) under Chevron deference.
What level of deference applies to Secretary’s interpretation. Chevron deference not clearly warranted? Secretary’s interpretive bulletin entitled to Chevron deference. Chevron deference applies; interpretation reasonable.
Whether ALJ’s personal-liability finding is supported by substantial evidence. Evidence insufficient to show knowingly authorized violation. Record shows Sumpter/Hartzell knew examinations weren’t completed; authority credibility intact. Substantial evidence supports personal liability.
Whether the January 6 Order and December 30 Citation are duplicative. Order duplicative of prior Citation. Standards impose distinct duties; not duplicative. Not duplicative; duties were distinct.

Key Cases Cited

  • Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837 (1984) (establishes deference to agency interpretations of ambiguous statutes)
  • Freeman United Coal Mining Co. v. Fed. Mine Safety & Health Review Comm’n, 108 F.3d 358 (D.C. Cir. 1997) (agency interpretations may be reviewed for reasonableness under Chevron framework)
  • United Elec., Radio & Mach. Workers v. 163 Pleasant St. Corp., 960 F.2d 1080 (1st Cir. 1992) (corporate-form liability and agency enforcement considerations under federal statutes)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Mike Sumpter v. Secretary of Labor, Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Date Published: Aug 15, 2014
Citation: 763 F.3d 1292
Docket Number: 13-15360
Court Abbreviation: 11th Cir.