History
  • No items yet
midpage
182 A.3d 576
R.I.
2018
Read the full case

Background

  • Plaintiffs are Portsmouth condominium owners who challenged property tax assessments for tax years 2009 and 2010 after property values fell post-2007 revaluation.
  • Portsmouth assessor (Dolce) carried forward the December 31, 2007 revaluation values to assess taxes for 2009 and 2010; plaintiffs contend assessments should reflect fair market value as of December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2009 respectively.
  • Plaintiffs exhausted local administrative remedies (assessor and board of review) and sued in Superior Court; parties stipulated to valuation facts and trial was on agreed statement of facts.
  • Superior Court held plaintiffs could use the annual fair market values (2008 and 2009) in their appeals and entered judgment for plaintiffs; assessor appealed to the Supreme Court.
  • Central statutory provisions at issue: G.L. chapter 44-5 (notably §§ 44-5-1, 44-5-12, 44-5-15, 44-5-26(b) form, and 44-5-30) and post-1997/2001 amendments changing revaluation/update cycle and adding the phrase "as of December 31 in the year of the last update or revaluation" for real estate.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether taxpayers appealing annual assessments are "locked in" to values "as of December 31 in the year of the last update or revaluation" (here Dec. 31, 2007) Plaintiffs: statutes allow annual appeals using fair market value "as of December 31 in each year" (so 2008/2009 values may be used). Defendant: § 44-5-15 and the § 44-5-26(b) form require listing real estate value "as of December 31 in the year of the last update or revaluation," so appeals must use the last revaluation year value (2007). Court: Statutory language is ambiguous; resolve doubts in favor of taxpayers; plaintiffs may challenge assessments using 2008 and 2009 fair market values (not locked to 2007).
Effect of 1997 revaluation/update regime and 2001 amendments on Wickes precedent Plaintiffs: Wickes allows challenges to carried-over assessments; annual remedies remain available despite statutory changes. Defendant: Wickes is weakened by 1997/2001 changes that suggest appeals should be tied to the last update/revaluation. Court: Wickes’ force is diminished but not dispositive; ambiguities require construction favoring taxpayers.
Proper canon of construction when tax statutes conflict Plaintiffs: ambiguous taxing provisions must be strictly construed for taxpayers. Defendant: specific-later statutes or specific statutory provisions (§ 44-5-15 and later 2001 amendments) should control over more general earlier provisions. Court: Applied multiple canons but gave decisive weight to rule resolving taxing-statute ambiguities in favor of the taxpayer.
Remedies when taxpayer proves overassessment under § 44-5-30 Plaintiffs: Having given account, paid taxes, and shown assessed value exceeded fair market value for the relevant assessment year, court must enter judgment for overtaxation. Defendant: Plaintiff must be confined to values permitted by the appeal form/statutes. Court: Because plaintiffs met § 44-5-30 conditions using annual fair market values, judgment must enter for taxpayers.

Key Cases Cited

  • Whittemore v. Thompson, 139 A.3d 530 (R.I. 2016) (statutory interpretation reviewed de novo; clear statutes given plain meaning)
  • Wickes Asset Mgmt., Inc. v. Dupuis, 679 A.2d 314 (R.I. 1996) (property owner disputing a carried-over assessment is not necessarily locked into prior valuation)
  • Inn Group Associates v. Booth, 593 A.2d 49 (R.I. 1991) (taxing statutes construed in favor of taxpayers)
  • Maggiacomo v. DiVincenzo, 410 A.2d 1332 (R.I. 1980) (doubts in construction of tax laws resolved for taxpayer)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Michael A. Balmuth v. David E. Dolce, in his capacity as Tax Assessor for the Town of Portsmouth John Qua v. David E. Dolce William Antle v. David E. Dolce
Court Name: Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Date Published: May 2, 2018
Citations: 182 A.3d 576; 17-6, 8, 9, 11, 12
Docket Number: 17-6, 8, 9, 11, 12
Court Abbreviation: R.I.
Log In
    Michael A. Balmuth v. David E. Dolce, in his capacity as Tax Assessor for the Town of Portsmouth John Qua v. David E. Dolce William Antle v. David E. Dolce, 182 A.3d 576