History
  • No items yet
midpage
McIntire
458 Mass. 257
Mass.
2010
Read the full case

Background

  • Johnstone held that, in SDP discharge proceedings under G. L. c. 123A, § 9, if both qualified examiners opine no longer sexually dangerous, the Commonwealth cannot meet its burden and the petitioner is entitled to discharge.
  • McIntire, charged with SDP since 1984, had a 2002 discharge trial where both examiners said he was no longer SDP, but CAB opined he remained dangerous; jury verdict was for SDP.
  • Johnstone was decided in 2009; the petitioner’s direct appeal from the 2002 judgment raised whether Johnstone applies to past judgments and whether the 2002 judgment was void ab initio.
  • Appeals Court held that Johnstone applies retroactively and that the 2002 judgment was not void ab initio but voidable; subsequent 2005, 2008, 2010 SDP dispositions still stood.
  • Supreme Judicial Court rejected the petitioner’s statutory and due process arguments to discharge him immediately, maintaining jurisdiction and validity of later discharge proceedings.
  • Court concluded the 2002 judgment should be reversed, but discharge is not granted due to the continued SDP findings in later petitions.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Johnstone applies to the 2002 direct appeal McIntire Commonwealth Johnstone applies; 2002 judgment reversed
Whether the 2002 judgment was void ab initio McIntire Commonwealth Judgment not void ab initio; voidable for error
Effect of post-2002 SDP discharge proceedings on entitlement to discharge McIntire Commonwealth Judgments in 2005, 2008, 2010 valid; discharge not automatic
Whether continued confinement after 2002 violated substantive due process McIntire Commonwealth No due process violation; ongoing petition rights preserved

Key Cases Cited

  • Johnstone, petitioner, 453 Mass. 544 (Mass. 2009) (gatekeeper role of two qualified examiners under § 9; if both opine not dangerous, CAB cannot meet burden)
  • Commonwealth v. Poissant, 443 Mass. 558 (Mass. 2005) (previous discussion of qualified examiners in § 12(b) SDP proceedings)
  • Commonwealth v. Dagley, 442 Mass. 713 (Mass. 2004) (principles of retroactivity for new interpretations of statutes)
  • Commonwealth v. Travis, 372 Mass. 238 (Mass. 1977) (due process implications when not dangerous SDP; discharge implications)
  • Commonwealth v. Gillis, 448 Mass. 354 (Mass. 2007) (limits on statutory authority for SDP commitments in Bridgewater context)
  • Lynch v. Commonwealth, 379 Mass. 757 (Mass. 1980) (void vs. voidable judgments; finality of judgments)
  • Lewis v. Commonwealth, 329 Mass. 445 (Mass. 1952) (general principle that erroneous judgments are voidable, not void)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: McIntire
Court Name: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Date Published: Nov 5, 2010
Citation: 458 Mass. 257
Court Abbreviation: Mass.