Maune v. Bankers Life & Casualty Insurance Company
4:10-cv-00074
D. IdahoOct 5, 2012Background
- Maune, a woman over 40 with a cleft palate/lip, worked as a Bankers Life sales agent in Pocatello, Idaho from Apr 16, 2007 to Dec 15, 2008 and was terminated.
- Original case involved many defendants; current dispute remains against Bankers Life on discrimination and retaliation claims.
- Maune signed an agent contract labeling her an independent contractor rather than an employee.
- In 2008 Maune sought the Pocatello branch sales manager job; interviews were short and she was told she would not get the job.
- Maune was terminated in Dec 2008; she filed EEOC/IHRC charges on Jun 4, 2009 and sued in Feb 2010 under Title VII, ADEA, ADA, IHRA.
- The court applied Darden/Murray framework to determine employee vs. independent contractor; found Maune to be an independent contractor, leading to dismissal of federal claims.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Employee vs. independent contractor status | Maune should be treated as an employee. | Maune is an independent contractor under contract and control factors. | Maune was an independent contractor; not an employee. |
| Timeliness of failure-to-promote claim | Claim was continuing; timely under EEOC/IHRC statutes. | Original denial occurred in 2008; untimely under EEOC/IHRC limits. | Original failure-to-promote claim time-barred. |
| Relation of new claims to EEOC charge | Related to denied promotions; should be within scope. | New unit manager/supervisor claims not reasonably related to the charge. | New unit manager/supervisor claims not properly before court; not survive. |
| Attorney’s fees | Maune should recover fees as prevailing party. | Maune is not a prevailing party; no fees awarded. | No attorney’s fees awarded. |
Key Cases Cited
- Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. v. Darden, 503 U.S. 318 (U.S. 1992) (test for employee vs. independent contractor via control twelve-factor test)
- Murray v. Principal Fin. Grp., Inc., 613 F.3d 943 (9th Cir. 2010) (ins. agents generally independent contractors under federal statutes)
- Ribinson v. Bankers Life & Cas. Co., 899 F. Supp. 848 (D.N.H. 1995) (support for independent contractor status of Bankers Life agents)
- EEOC v. Farmer Bros. Co., 31 F.3d 891 (9th Cir. 1994) (jurisdictional scope of EEOC investigations for related claims)
- B.K.B. v. Maui Police Dept., 276 F.3d 1091 (9th Cir. 2002) (scope of jurisdiction for claims within EEOC charge)
- National R.R. Passenger Corp. v. Morgan, 536 U.S. 101 (U.S. 2002) (discrete discriminatory acts and timely filing rules)
- Barnhart v. New York Life Ins. Co., 141 F.3d 1310 (9th Cir. 1998) (all-or-nothing nature of employee vs. independent contractor status)
