Matthew Blake Knighton v. Commonwealth of Virginia
0852213
| Va. Ct. App. | May 3, 2022Background
- Trooper stopped Matthew Knighton on a motorcycle after radar showed 95 mph in a 55 mph zone; Knighton received a reckless driving summons.
- General District Court convicted Knighton of reckless driving and imposed a 10-day suspended sentence, 90-day license suspension, and $1,000 fine (with $500 suspended). Knighton appealed to the circuit court; his notice of appeal required him to appear April 5, 2021.
- Knighton failed to appear on April 5 and the circuit court issued a capias.
- On July 14, 2021, Knighton pled no contest to reckless driving and to failure to appear and offered sentencing evidence (testifying about gravel, an alleged speedometer delay, and a driver-improvement class).
- The court reviewed Knighton’s driving record (showing another failure to appear), convicted him of both offenses, and sentenced him to 12 months with 9 months suspended (3 months active) for reckless driving, a 6-month license suspension, a $500 fine, and 10 days active for failure to appear.
- Knighton appealed, arguing the failure-to-appear conviction was unsupported and the sentences were an abuse of discretion; the Court of Appeals affirmed.
Issues
| Issue | Knighton’s Argument | Commonwealth’s Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether Knighton could challenge the sufficiency of evidence for failure to appear after pleading no contest | Commonwealth still had to present sufficient evidence and there was no proof Knighton or counsel failed to appear | A nolo contendere plea waives all defenses except jurisdictional and admits the facts supporting the charge | Plea waived right to contest sufficiency; conviction stands |
| Whether the circuit court abused its discretion in sentencing (active jail time, license suspension) | Sentence is harsher than district court’s and improperly relied on an unrelated failure to appear | Sentences were imposed after hearing evidence, are within statutory ranges, and circuit court conducts de novo review of misdemeanors | Sentences were within statutory limits; no abuse of discretion; affirmed |
Key Cases Cited
- Meekins v. Commonwealth, 72 Va. App. 61 (2020) (nolo contendere plea waives defenses except jurisdictional)
- Savino v. Commonwealth, 239 Va. 534 (1990) (effect of nolo contendere plea)
- Commonwealth v. Jackson, 255 Va. 552 (1998) (nolo contendere admission for sentencing purposes)
- Smith v. Commonwealth, 59 Va. App. 710 (2012) (plea admits facts supporting the accusation)
- Wright v. Commonwealth, 52 Va. App. 690 (2008) (circuit court conducts de novo misdemeanor trials)
- Garibaldi v. Commonwealth, 71 Va. App. 64 (2019) (sentencing review standard)
- Martin v. Commonwealth, 274 Va. 733 (2007) (abuse-of-discretion standard for sentencing)
- Du v. Commonwealth, 292 Va. 555 (2016) (sentence within statutory maximum will not be overturned)
- Alston v. Commonwealth, 274 Va. 759 (2007) (same principle on statutory limits)
- Thomason v. Commonwealth, 69 Va. App. 89 (2018) (once sentence is within statutory range, appellate review ends)
