History
  • No items yet
midpage
144 A.D.3d 1041
N.Y. App. Div.
2016
Read the full case

Background

  • Roslyn Jane Holdings, LLC (petitioner) owned commercial property in Roslyn Heights, Nassau County.
  • L & L Associates Holding Corp. (respondent) purchased a Nassau County tax lien at public auction.
  • Nassau County sent notices of the tax lien sale (Oct 20, 2010 and Jan 19, 2011) to Roslyn Jane at 71 Jane Street, Roslyn Heights.
  • In January 2013, L & L served notices to redeem on Roslyn Jane by certified mail (returned "unclaimed / unable to forward") and by first-class mail (not returned).
  • Roslyn Jane filed a CPLR article 78 proceeding to annul the Treasurer’s determination approving issuance of a tax deed; Supreme Court denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Was notice constitutionally adequate under due process? Roslyn Jane argued inadequate notice because certified mail was returned unclaimed. L & L argued notice was reasonably calculated: certified and first-class mail were sent; first-class mail was not returned; Roslyn Jane had the duty to update its address. Court held notice satisfied due process; first-class mail not returned and certified return did not defeat adequacy.

Key Cases Cited

  • Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co., 339 U.S. 306 (U.S. 1950) (due process requires notice reasonably calculated to inform interested parties).
  • Jones v. Flowers, 547 U.S. 220 (U.S. 2006) (sender may need to take additional steps in limited circumstances when notice is returned).
  • Matter of Harner v. County of Tioga, 5 N.Y.3d 136 (N.Y. 2005) (due process satisfied where certified mail was returned but ordinary mail was not).
  • Matter of McCann v. Scaduto, 71 N.Y.2d 164 (N.Y. 1987) (tax lien sale notice requirements).
  • Matter of Beckman v. Greentree Sec., 87 N.Y.2d 566 (N.Y. 1996) (actual receipt not required for due process).
  • Kennedy v. Mossafa, 100 N.Y.2d 1 (N.Y. 2003) (due process notice principles).
  • 149 Glen St. Corp. v. Jefferson, 140 A.D.3d 742 (2d Dep't 2016) (application of notice standards in tax-sale context).
  • Zamor v. L & L Assoc. Holding Corp., 85 A.D.3d 1154 (2d Dep't 2011) (tax-sale notice cases).
  • Orra Realty Corp. v. Gillen, 46 A.D.3d 649 (2d Dep't 2007) (tax-sale notice).
  • 89 Pine Hollow Rd. Realty Corp. v. Am. Tax Fund Foothill, 41 A.D.3d 771 (2d Dep't 2007) (tax-sale notice).
  • Temple Bnai Shalom of Great Neck v. Vill. of Great Neck Estates, 32 A.D.3d 391 (2d Dep't 2006) (notice requirements).
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Matter of Roslyn Jane Holdings, LLC v. Jefferson
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Nov 23, 2016
Citations: 144 A.D.3d 1041; 42 N.Y.S.3d 61; 2016 NY Slip Op 7966; 2016 NY Slip Op 07966; 2014-10849
Docket Number: 2014-10849
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
Log In
    Matter of Roslyn Jane Holdings, LLC v. Jefferson, 144 A.D.3d 1041