midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
100 F.4th 914
7th Cir.
2024
Read the full case

Background

  • Edward Johnson filed for Chapter 13 bankruptcy and made about $3,800 in plan payments to the bankruptcy trustee, Marilyn O. Marshall.
  • Only $750 was paid out to creditors as pre-confirmation adequate protection payments; the remainder was held pending confirmation of Johnson’s plan.
  • The bankruptcy court never confirmed Johnson’s payment plan due to unresolved issues with a loan and domestic support obligations.
  • The bankruptcy court dismissed the case for unreasonable delay and ordered the trustee to return all undisbursed funds to Johnson, including a $260 fee she had withheld as compensation for her services.
  • The trustee appealed, claiming entitlement to retain the fee under 28 U.S.C. § 586(e)(2) and 11 U.S.C. § 1326(b), even after dismissal and lack of plan confirmation.

Issues

Issue Johnson’s Argument Marshall’s Argument Held
Whether a Chapter 13 trustee may retain her fee from undisbursed payments if the plan is never confirmed All undisbursed funds, including trustee's fee, must be returned to debtor; no authority to deduct fee if plan not confirmed Trustee should be entitled to deduct and keep a statutory percentage fee, per § 586(e)(2) and § 1326(b), even without confirmation Trustee must return all undisbursed funds, including her fee, to the debtor if the plan is not confirmed

Key Cases Cited

  • Stamat v. Neary, 635 F.3d 974 (7th Cir. 2011) (de novo review of legal questions in bankruptcy)
  • Ransom v. FIA Card Servs., N.A., 562 U.S. 61 (U.S. 2011) (starting statutory interpretation with plain meaning)
  • Russello v. United States, 464 U.S. 16 (U.S. 1983) (statutory silence implies intentional exclusion)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Marilyn Marshall v. Edward Johnson
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Date Published: May 3, 2024
Citations: 100 F.4th 914; 23-2212
Docket Number: 23-2212
Court Abbreviation: 7th Cir.
Log In
    Marilyn Marshall v. Edward Johnson, 100 F.4th 914