History
  • No items yet
midpage
292 Ga. 76
Ga.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Lumpkin County appeals a grant of summary judgment in GIIP's favor after the county's insurer became insolvent.
  • GIIP seeks to determine whether pending workers’ compensation claims fall within the net worth exemption of OCGA § 33-36-3 (4) (G).
  • OCGA § 33-36-3 (4) (G) excludes claims arising from policies of insureds with net worth over $25 million, calculated on a consolidated basis for the insured and affiliates.
  • GIIP requested financial information to assess the County’s net worth and filed a declaratory judgment action. The trial court held Lumpkin County’s net worth was $66,812,946, triggering the exemption.
  • The County argues net worth does not apply to government entities and that the county’s net assets are only $5.6 million, so it should be covered; the County also challenges the statute as unconstitutional as applied.
  • The court rejects the arguments, holding the net worth concept applies to counties, and that the statute is plain and unambiguous; the county is not entitled to GIIP coverage.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Does net worth apply to counties under the statute? Lumpkin County: net worth does not apply to government entities. GIIP: net worth applies on consolidated basis for all insureds, including counties. Net worth applies; county is excluded from GIIP coverage.
Should the County's net assets (not net worth) determine eligibility for coverage? County argues only unrestricted net assets should count. GIIP uses net worth as defined by statute, including all assets and liabilities. Statutory net worth controls; no rewrite to net assets.
Is the net worth exemption constitutional as applied to the County? Due process rights are implicated by charging fees without benefit. County has no due process right to challenge the act as a public corporation. Constitutional challenge rejected; due process not violated.

Key Cases Cited

  • Georgia Insurers Insolvency Pool v. Elbert County, 258 Ga. 317 (1988) ( GIIP and net worth exemption apply to counties as legal entities)
  • Shorter College v. Baptist Convention of Ga., 279 Ga. 466 (2005) (plain language governs statutory interpretation; avoid rewriting statutes)
  • Abdulkadir v. State, 279 Ga. 122 (2005) (courts do not rewrite statutory language)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Lumpkin County v. Georgia Insurers Insolvency Pool
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Nov 19, 2012
Citations: 292 Ga. 76; 734 S.E.2d 880; 2012 Fulton County D. Rep. 3597; 2012 Ga. LEXIS 952; S12A1451
Docket Number: S12A1451
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
Log In
    Lumpkin County v. Georgia Insurers Insolvency Pool, 292 Ga. 76