Long v. State
309 Ga. 721
Ga.2020Background
- Jennifer Long and her husband Timothy adopted 18-month-old Alexis in Nov. 2011; DFCS oversight ended after adoption.
- On Jan. 29, 2012, Alexis was found unresponsive at home after returning from church; she was hospitalized, declared brain-dead, and died; medical examiner ruled cause of death blunt-force head trauma.
- Alexis had a subdural hematoma, retinal hemorrhages, scalp hair loss, fluid and swelling on the back of her head, and numerous bruises of varying ages and shapes consistent with repeated nonaccidental trauma.
- A broken wooden changing table was found in Alexis’s room; Appellant’s statements to police changed over time (saying Alexis went limp on the floor, later that Alexis fell from or was thrown onto the broken changing table).
- Timothy pled guilty to second-degree child cruelty and testified for the State, saying he was near the car and heard a noise; Appellant was alone in the room at the time per her admissions.
- Jury convicted Appellant of malice murder and first-degree child cruelty; she received life without parole and 20 concurrent years; she appealed arguing insufficiency of the evidence and ineffective assistance of counsel.
Issues
| Issue | Long's Argument | State's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sufficiency of the evidence (circumstantial & due process) | Evidence did not exclude reasonable hypothesis that Timothy inflicted fatal injuries; evidence was circumstantial under OCGA §24-14-6 | Jury could reasonably disbelieve Timothy, credit inconsistencies in Long’s accounts, and infer Long’s guilt from medical/physical evidence and broken table | Affirmed — viewed in light most favorable to verdict, evidence (medical, physical, and testimonial) was sufficient to exclude other reasonable hypotheses and satisfy Jackson v. Virginia standard |
| Ineffective assistance of counsel | Trial counsel erred by not objecting to prosecutor's closing and by presenting an unreasonable defense theory (insufficient medical investigation; reliance on accident/involuntary manslaughter theory) | Prosecutor’s closing was permissible (inferences from nonproduction of witnesses); defense pursued accident/involuntary manslaughter and pointed to Timothy; appellant failed to show what additional investigation would have produced | Affirmed — no deficient performance: failure to object would have been meritless; no prejudice shown and appellant did not proffer what additional investigation would have revealed |
Key Cases Cited
- Smith v. State, 307 Ga. 680 (circumstantial-evidence test; jury decides reasonableness of alternative hypotheses)
- Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (constitutional standard for sufficiency of the evidence)
- Chavez v. State, 307 Ga. 804 (deference to jury credibility determinations on sufficiency review)
- Virger v. State, 305 Ga. 281 (sufficiency and circumstantial evidence principles)
- Gomez v. State, 301 Ga. 445 (sufficiency review standards)
- McGee v. State, 260 Ga. 178 (permissible inferences from nonproduction of witnesses in closing)
- Isaac v. State, 263 Ga. 872 (similar rule on nonproduction of witnesses)
- Lupoe v. State, 300 Ga. 233 (requirement to proffer what additional investigation would have shown to prove prejudice)
- Gaston v. State, 307 Ga. 634 (Strickland standard and assessing counsel performance)
- Vega v. State, 285 Ga. 32 (jury's role in resolving credibility conflicts)
